tlhIngan-Hol Mailing List Archive by Author: March 2004

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Starting: Mon Mar 01 11:33:15 2004
Ending: Sat Mar 27 21:06:59 2004
Number of messages: 589

• ...Paul
  • Re: chuv (Mon Mar 01 11:33:15 2004)
  • Re: chuv (Tue Mar 02 15:20:04 2004)
  • Did Hoch, now pagh... (Thu Mar 04 16:35:59 2004)
  • Re: Did Hoch, now pagh... (Thu Mar 04 22:31:44 2004)
  • Re: Did Hoch, now pagh... (Fri Mar 05 13:39:28 2004)
  • Re: Did Hoch, now pagh... (Sat Mar 06 12:03:33 2004)
  • Re: Did Hoch, now pagh... (Sat Mar 06 12:05:25 2004)
  • Re: Did Hoch, now pagh... (Sun Mar 07 18:49:46 2004)
  • Re: multiple verb suffixes (Tue Mar 16 08:54:27 2004)
  • Re: multiple verb suffixes (Tue Mar 16 14:07:35 2004)
  • Re: multiple verb suffixes (Tue Mar 16 15:30:38 2004)
  • Re: multiple verb suffixes (Thu Mar 18 13:45:28 2004)
  • nuqDaq chaHtaH Hoch (Tue Mar 23 21:41:55 2004)
  • Re: Using object prefixes with "intransitive" verbs (Thu Mar 25 12:56:55 2004)
  • RE: Using object prefixes with "intransitive" verbs (Thu Mar 25 16:06:22 2004)
  • RE: Klingon WOTD: jat (v) (Sun Mar 28 14:17:15 2004)
  • RE: Using object prefixes with "intransitive" verbs (Sun Mar 28 14:33:37 2004)
• Ariba Sultan
  • Re: tlhingan-hol Digest V1 #14 (Mon Mar 08 13:15:31 2004)
• RatA KinG
  • http://ar.groups.yahoo.com/group/Rosario_Watchers/ (Tue Mar 16 23:04:24 2004)
• A4773492
  • Re: unanalyzable words in tkd (Wed Mar 10 05:51:43 2004)
  • Re: unanalyzable words in tkd (Wed Mar 10 07:50:26 2004)
  • Re: unanalyzable words in tkd (Wed Mar 10 08:07:35 2004)
  • Re: unanalyzable words in tkd (Wed Mar 10 09:28:01 2004)
  • Re: unanalyzable words in tkd (Wed Mar 10 11:22:11 2004)
  • Re: unanalyzable words in tkd (Wed Mar 10 14:03:03 2004)
  • Re: unanalyzable words in tkd (Wed Mar 10 14:59:43 2004)
  • Re: unanalyzable words in tkd (Wed Mar 10 15:53:01 2004)
  • Re: koi baat nahin (Wed Mar 10 20:57:29 2004)
  • Re: koi baat nahin (Wed Mar 10 21:38:25 2004)
  • Re: koi baat nahin (Wed Mar 10 21:50:06 2004)
  • Re: koi baat nahin (Thu Mar 11 00:48:11 2004)
  • Re: sun vs. star (Fri Mar 12 06:49:33 2004)
  • Re: KLBC (Fri Mar 12 06:54:54 2004)
  • KLBC (Fri Mar 12 06:57:57 2004)
  • Re: koi baat nahin (Fri Mar 12 22:36:36 2004)
  • Re: prefix trick / KLBC (Mon Mar 15 22:08:36 2004)
  • Re: reH 'e' Daqap (Wed Mar 31 10:57:14 2004)
  • Re: ghunchu'wI' QIn vIyajmeH QaH vIpoQbej. (Wed Mar 31 22:01:13 2004)
  • Re: it; SIS (Wed Mar 31 22:35:37 2004)
  • Re: -Daq with verbs of motion (Wed Mar 31 22:56:22 2004)
  • Re: ghunchu'wI' QIn vIyajmeH QaH vIpoQbej./KLBC (Wed Mar 31 23:38:21 2004)
  • Re: it; SIS (Wed Mar 31 23:56:33 2004)
• Agnieszka Solska
  • Re: Tao Te Ching Chp. 1 (Sun Mar 07 12:32:47 2004)
  • Re: yuch watlh 'ej Human jat (Mon Mar 08 03:46:08 2004)
• Alan Anderson
  • Re: chuv (Mon Mar 01 19:33:06 2004)
  • Re: chuv (Mon Mar 01 19:33:38 2004)
  • Re: yIHagh! (Thu Mar 04 15:58:11 2004)
  • Re: Did Hoch, now pagh... (Fri Mar 05 19:51:59 2004)
  • Re: imperatives of verbs of quality (Mon Mar 08 11:05:17 2004)
  • Re: if not {pemHov},... (Mon Mar 08 19:07:54 2004)
  • Re: pIqaD (Tue Mar 09 19:45:56 2004)
  • Re: chuv (Wed Mar 10 13:33:00 2004)
  • Re: tuj luSpetmey (Wed Mar 10 13:33:00 2004)
  • Re: March HolQeD (Wed Mar 10 18:41:11 2004)
  • Re: pIqaD (Wed Mar 10 19:36:21 2004)
  • Re: KLI on The Daily Show (Sun Mar 14 16:26:32 2004)
  • Re: possible proverb (Thu Mar 18 14:07:08 2004)
  • Re: The Next Translation? (Thu Mar 18 14:07:08 2004)
  • Re: yaH chu' vIghaj (Fri Mar 26 16:23:36 2004)
  • Re: jIQagh 'ach SachuH (Sat Mar 27 21:45:27 2004)
  • [tlhIngan-Hol] Re: *Lindt* yuch <<qIb lengwI' tlhIngan Hol>> je (Sat Mar 27 21:47:07 2004)
  • Re: mu' chu' DIchenmoHnIS'a'? pagh mu' ngo' DIlo'laH'a'? (Sat Mar 27 21:47:24 2004)
  • [tlhIngan-Hol] Re: tlhingan-hol Digest V1 #2 (Sat Mar 27 21:47:42 2004)
  • Re: [tlhIngan-Hol] Re: Hoch placement (Sat Mar 27 21:48:00 2004)
  • Re: Klingon WOTD: lIghon (n) (Sat Mar 27 21:48:42 2004)
  • Re: Klingon Language Highlights (Sat Mar 27 21:52:10 2004)
  • Re: geography (Sat Mar 27 21:52:10 2004)
  • RE: Unscrewed-qa' (Sun Mar 28 19:35:02 2004)
  • Re: qIDmey {Haiku}mey je (Tue Mar 30 15:18:17 2004)
  • Re: it; SIS (Tue Mar 30 15:27:56 2004)
  • Re: it; SIS (Tue Mar 30 16:59:47 2004)
  • Re: -Daq, subject, object (Tue Mar 30 17:25:00 2004)
  • Re: about (Tue Mar 30 20:21:40 2004)
  • Re: it; SIS (Tue Mar 30 21:02:12 2004)
  • Re: groan (Wed Mar 31 11:33:34 2004)
  • Re: it; SIS (Wed Mar 31 17:15:39 2004)
  • Re: it; SIS (Wed Mar 31 17:15:39 2004)
  • Re: ghunchu'wI' QIn vIyajmeH QaH vIpoQbej. (Wed Mar 31 17:26:32 2004)
  • Re: it; SIS (Wed Mar 31 18:06:14 2004)
• avarQ, son of gharan
  • Welsh National Anthem (KLBC?) (Sun Mar 07 17:06:14 2004)
  • RE: Welsh National Anthem (KLBC?) (Mon Mar 08 07:56:40 2004)
  • RE: Welsh National Anthem (KLBC?) (Mon Mar 08 10:40:07 2004)
  • RE: Welsh National Anthem (KLBC?) (Wed Mar 10 05:57:03 2004)
• Beth Baisch, the tuftedpuffin
  • Couple of translations needed (Thu Mar 18 19:07:06 2004)
• captain kalaa
  • Re: Klingon Honor Guard (Thu Mar 11 04:05:32 2004)
  • Re: KLI on The Daily Show (Sat Mar 13 05:51:41 2004)
  • Re: KLI on The Daily Show (Fri Mar 19 08:04:00 2004)
  • Re: tetlhvamDaq Hoch nuvpu' /everyone on this list (Fri Mar 26 06:30:37 2004)
  • Re: tetlhvamDaq Hoch nuvpu' /everyone on this list (Mon Mar 29 04:58:27 2004)
• cheesbro
  • Re: MSN jabbI'ID labwI' lo'wI'pu' (Wed Mar 03 15:19:13 2004)
  • Re: if not {pemHov},... (Mon Mar 08 18:53:53 2004)
  • Re: 'oy'naQ: painstik or painstick? (Tue Mar 16 18:13:07 2004)
  • Re: nuqDaq chaHtaH Hoch (Wed Mar 24 10:40:35 2004)
  • Re: Using object prefixes with "intransitive" verbs (Mon Mar 29 09:14:24 2004)
• Christian Einfeldt
  • Re: Opinions needed on Klingon pIqaD keyboard mapping (Mon Mar 15 06:29:46 2004)
• d'Armond Speers, Ph.D.
  • Re: geography (Mon Mar 01 13:08:26 2004)
  • Re: geography (Mon Mar 01 15:22:11 2004)
  • Re: less predictable compound words in tkd+addendum (Mon Mar 01 15:23:44 2004)
  • pojwI' update (Thu Mar 04 01:01:19 2004)
  • RE: Did Hoch, now pagh... (Mon Mar 08 09:45:51 2004)
  • RE: KLBC (Fri Mar 12 06:25:12 2004)
  • RE: KLBC (Fri Mar 12 06:52:53 2004)
  • RE: KLBC (Fri Mar 12 07:09:19 2004)
  • TechTV (Sat Mar 20 11:51:45 2004)
  • Unscrewed-qa' (Wed Mar 24 06:01:03 2004)
  • RE: Unscrewed-qa' (Wed Mar 24 11:26:43 2004)
  • RE: Unscrewed-qa' (Wed Mar 24 20:04:37 2004)
  • RE: Unscrewed-qa' (Wed Mar 24 20:07:00 2004)
  • RE: about (Sat Mar 27 21:18:00 2004)
  • RE: tetlhvamDaq Hoch nuvpu' /everyone on this list (Tue Mar 30 17:58:27 2004)
• Dar'Qang
  • Re: Did Hoch, now pagh... (Fri Mar 05 17:17:54 2004)
  • use of 'e' in to-be construction (Fri Mar 05 18:06:18 2004)
  • Re: use of 'e' in to-be construction (Sat Mar 06 17:26:43 2004)
  • Re: jIH much chu' (Sat Mar 06 17:35:11 2004)
  • Re: if not {pemHov},... (Mon Mar 08 17:58:37 2004)
  • Re: multiple verb suffixes (Mon Mar 15 20:47:34 2004)
  • Re: Unscrewed-qa' (Sat Mar 27 12:52:52 2004)
  • Re: <<'e'>> DIpvaD tammey je (Sat Mar 27 12:58:57 2004)
  • Re: De'wI' patmey (Sat Mar 27 13:06:35 2004)
  • Re: <<'e'>> DIpvaD tammey je (Mon Mar 29 20:29:25 2004)
  • Re: Using object prefixes with "intransitive" verbs (Mon Mar 29 20:45:03 2004)
  • -Daq, subject, object (Mon Mar 29 20:59:48 2004)
  • Re: -Daq, subject, object (Tue Mar 30 21:05:48 2004)
  • Re: Using object prefixes with "intransitive" verbs (Tue Mar 30 22:03:16 2004)
  • -Daq with verbs of motion (Wed Mar 31 22:17:46 2004)
• David Trimboli
  • Re: chuv (Mon Mar 01 11:12:44 2004)
  • Re: geography (Mon Mar 01 11:29:00 2004)
  • Re: chuv (Mon Mar 01 12:28:13 2004)
  • Re: chuv (Mon Mar 01 12:30:03 2004)
  • Re: geography (Mon Mar 01 13:38:13 2004)
  • Re: tuj luSpetmey (Tue Mar 02 06:27:40 2004)
  • Re: law'/puS DIpvaD tam <'e'> je (Tue Mar 02 06:33:10 2004)
  • Re: law'/puS DIpvaD tam <'e'> je (Tue Mar 02 19:24:37 2004)
  • Re: <<roD Huch Hutlh cha'maH ben ghojwI' je>> (Wed Mar 03 06:24:53 2004)
  • Re: Did Hoch, now pagh... (Thu Mar 04 17:10:48 2004)
  • Re: Did Hoch, now pagh... (Fri Mar 05 06:43:59 2004)
  • Re: Did Hoch, now pagh... (Sat Mar 06 09:27:51 2004)
  • Re: Did Hoch, now pagh... (Sat Mar 06 13:29:17 2004)
  • Re: imperatives of verbs of quality (Mon Mar 08 09:02:37 2004)
  • MUSH is back! (Tue Mar 09 22:00:49 2004)
  • Re: if not {pemHov},... (Wed Mar 10 06:30:45 2004)
  • Re: {Hov'a'} pagh {Hov'a'}be' (Wed Mar 10 08:10:47 2004)
  • Re: imperatives of verbs of state (round 2) (Sat Mar 13 09:23:33 2004)
  • Re: KLI on The Daily Show (Sat Mar 13 09:26:41 2004)
  • Re: KLBC Prefix trick (Mon Mar 15 09:11:14 2004)
  • Re: headless {-bogh}? (Mon Mar 15 09:25:23 2004)
  • Re: Imperatives with {-eghmoH}, round 2 (Mon Mar 15 16:05:31 2004)
  • Re: Imperatives with {-eghmoH}, round 2 (Tue Mar 16 07:30:10 2004)
  • Dialects on the MUSH (Tue Mar 16 13:26:55 2004)
  • Re: Imperatives with {-eghmoH}, round 2 (Tue Mar 16 13:42:31 2004)
  • Dialects on the MUSH (Tue Mar 16 16:24:00 2004)
  • Re: headless {-bogh}? (Tue Mar 16 16:33:37 2004)
  • Re: B SoH A'e' (Fri Mar 19 05:35:26 2004)
  • That's not canon (Wed Mar 24 20:36:55 2004)
  • Re: That's not canon (Thu Mar 25 06:41:40 2004)
  • Re: Using object prefixes with "intransitive" verbs (Thu Mar 25 12:13:59 2004)
  • Re: Using object prefixes with "intransitive" verbs (Thu Mar 25 17:20:21 2004)
  • Re: Using object prefixes with "intransitive" verbs (Sat Mar 27 07:59:31 2004)
  • Re: about (Mon Mar 29 06:24:12 2004)
  • Re: Using object prefixes with "intransitive" verbs (Mon Mar 29 06:40:25 2004)
  • Re: it; SIS (Mon Mar 29 06:42:18 2004)
  • Re: Using object prefixes with "intransitive" verbs (Mon Mar 29 07:39:56 2004)
  • Re: Using object prefixes with "intransitive" verbs (Mon Mar 29 10:49:02 2004)
  • Re: it; SIS (Mon Mar 29 19:57:06 2004)
  • Re: Using object prefixes with "intransitive" verbs (Tue Mar 30 07:09:35 2004)
  • Re: lojmItDaq puqbe'wI' vIlegh. (Tue Mar 30 07:14:24 2004)
  • Re: about (Tue Mar 30 07:26:07 2004)
  • Re: it; SIS (Tue Mar 30 20:48:07 2004)
  • Re: it; SIS (Wed Mar 31 08:31:16 2004)
  • Re: about (Wed Mar 31 08:35:04 2004)
  • Re: Using object prefixes with "intransitive" verbs (Wed Mar 31 08:41:41 2004)
  • Re: Page of problems for KLI Wiki (was Re: lojmItDaq puqbe'wI' vIleghpu') (Wed Mar 31 08:43:45 2004)
  • Re: ghunchu'wI' QIn vIyajmeH QaH vIpoQbej. (Wed Mar 31 08:48:45 2004)
  • Re: about (Wed Mar 31 11:26:41 2004)
  • Re: it; SIS (Wed Mar 31 18:19:32 2004)
• De'vID jonwI'
  • Re: geography (Mon Mar 01 11:38:16 2004)
  • Klingon Language Highlights (Mon Mar 01 11:38:46 2004)
  • Re: The specifics of indefinites (Mon Mar 01 13:23:00 2004)
  • Re: more vector questions (Mon Mar 01 15:53:42 2004)
  • tuj luSpetmey (Mon Mar 01 15:58:09 2004)
  • Re: tuj luSpetmey (Mon Mar 01 18:26:49 2004)
  • Re: tuj luSpetmey (Mon Mar 01 18:48:04 2004)
  • Re: tuj luSpetmey (Mon Mar 01 18:54:29 2004)
  • Re: law'/puS DIpvaD tam <'e'> je (Tue Mar 02 18:48:03 2004)
  • Re: tuj luSpetmey (Tue Mar 02 18:51:10 2004)
  • Re: Klingon Honor Guard (Tue Mar 02 18:54:58 2004)
  • Dejpu'bogh Hov! (Tue Mar 02 19:01:11 2004)
  • Re: tuj luSpetmey (Wed Mar 03 19:44:46 2004)
  • Re: Klingon Honor Guard (Wed Mar 03 20:40:58 2004)
  • Re: Klingon Honor Guard (Fri Mar 05 15:06:55 2004)
  • Re: luSpet <<ghor>> qechmey (Fri Mar 05 16:07:33 2004)
  • Re: Did Hoch, now pagh... (Sun Mar 07 16:01:23 2004)
  • Re: STOP SENDING ME THIS KLINGON STUFF (Sun Mar 07 16:16:04 2004)
  • Re: if not {pemHov},... (Tue Mar 09 10:32:51 2004)
  • Re: if not {pemHov},... (Tue Mar 09 10:38:49 2004)
  • Re: {Hov'a'} pagh {Hov'a'}be'? (Tue Mar 09 10:52:06 2004)
  • Re: partially analyzable words in tkd (Tue Mar 09 20:39:15 2004)
  • Re: unanalyzable words in tkd (Tue Mar 09 21:28:22 2004)
  • Re: Qum SeHlaw (Tue Mar 09 21:31:15 2004)
  • Re: unanalyzable words in tkd (Wed Mar 10 14:15:56 2004)
  • Re: unanalyzable words in tkd (Wed Mar 10 14:50:19 2004)
  • Re: pIqaD (Wed Mar 10 14:56:05 2004)
  • koi baat nahin (Wed Mar 10 15:54:16 2004)
  • Re: unanalyzable words in tkd (Wed Mar 10 16:05:10 2004)
  • Re: Did Hoch, now pagh... (Fri Mar 12 16:39:12 2004)
  • Re: partially analyzable words in tkd (Fri Mar 12 16:39:51 2004)
  • Re: tuj luSpetmey (Fri Mar 12 16:40:33 2004)
  • Re: koi baat nahin (Fri Mar 12 16:42:02 2004)
  • Re: KLBC (Sat Mar 13 10:33:37 2004)
  • Re: headless {-bogh}? (Tue Mar 16 16:01:57 2004)
  • Re: Couple of translations needed (Thu Mar 18 20:07:39 2004)
  • Re: Couple of translations needed (Thu Mar 18 20:26:14 2004)
  • Klingon weapons on South Park (Fri Mar 19 16:40:09 2004)
  • [no subject] (Wed Mar 24 19:39:32 2004)
  • Re: -Daq on numbers? (Wed Mar 24 19:51:20 2004)
  • Re: nuqDaq chaHtaH Hoch (Wed Mar 24 19:52:29 2004)
  • RE: Unscrewed-qa' (Wed Mar 24 19:53:40 2004)
  • Re: That's not canon (Wed Mar 24 22:24:55 2004)
  • Re: Unscrewed-qa' (Thu Mar 25 13:43:24 2004)
  • Re: That's not canon (Thu Mar 25 13:45:50 2004)
  • Re: That's not canon (Thu Mar 25 13:48:29 2004)
  • Re: nuqDaq chaHtaH Hoch (Thu Mar 25 13:56:56 2004)
  • Re: Using object prefixes with "intransitive" verbs (Thu Mar 25 14:20:47 2004)
  • Re: That's not canon (Thu Mar 25 16:01:25 2004)
  • Re: That's not canon (Thu Mar 25 16:31:33 2004)
  • Re: De'wI' patmey (Thu Mar 25 20:49:39 2004)
  • RE: Using object prefixes with "intransitive" verbs (Fri Mar 26 13:12:20 2004)
  • that (was: That's not canon) (Sun Mar 28 10:52:18 2004)
  • Re: qIDmey {Haiku}mey je (Sun Mar 28 10:54:42 2004)
  • RE: Using object prefixes with "intransitive" verbs (Sun Mar 28 11:23:17 2004)
• Eric Andeen
  • RE: if not {pemHov},... (Tue Mar 09 19:01:16 2004)
  • RE: KLBC (Fri Mar 12 10:18:50 2004)
• G. Roderick Singleton
  • Re: Chatting/Emailing in pIqaD (Sat Mar 13 20:02:00 2004)
• Heather Myers
  • Using object prefixes with "intransitive" verbs (Thu Mar 25 11:45:06 2004)
  • RE: Using object prefixes with "intransitive" verbs (Thu Mar 25 13:36:56 2004)
• Jim Fox-Davis
  • The Next Translation? (Fri Mar 05 11:33:59 2004)
• keltay
  • Re: Klingon Honor Guard (Thu Mar 11 20:16:24 2004)
• Lawrence M. Schoen
  • HolQeD veb (Fri Mar 26 04:52:31 2004)
• Lawrence Schoen
  • Klingon (and Elvish) in the news (Tue Mar 02 11:40:47 2004)
  • March HolQeD (Wed Mar 10 08:43:22 2004)
• Le Nguyen Xuan Dien
  • Don't send me any letter ! (Thu Mar 11 20:25:57 2004)
• Lieven L . Litaer
  • Re: pIqaD (Wed Mar 10 14:33:06 2004)
  • Re: sun vs. star (Fri Mar 12 09:38:13 2004)
  • Re: KLBC (Fri Mar 12 21:37:16 2004)
  • Re: about (Sun Mar 28 02:22:34 2004)
  • Re: it; SIS (Mon Mar 29 18:28:29 2004)
  • Re: -Daq, subject, object (Tue Mar 30 10:48:02 2004)
• Lieven Litaer
  • Re: KLI on The Daily Show (Mon Mar 15 12:35:32 2004)
  • Re: Opinions needed on Klingon pIqaD keyboard mapping (Mon Mar 15 13:05:55 2004)
  • Re: headless {-bogh}? (Mon Mar 15 13:11:12 2004)
  • Re: Imperatives with {-eghmoH}, round 2 (Tue Mar 16 13:06:30 2004)
  • Re: Imperatives with {-eghmoH}, round 2 (Tue Mar 16 13:12:14 2004)
  • Re: tu'taHghachHey/ KLBC (Tue Mar 16 13:16:16 2004)
  • Re: prefix trick / KLBC (Tue Mar 16 13:19:48 2004)
  • Re: multiple verb suffixes (Tue Mar 16 13:35:08 2004)
  • Re: multiple verb suffixes (Tue Mar 16 13:45:56 2004)
  • Re: Imperatives with {-eghmoH}, round 2 (Tue Mar 16 13:56:18 2004)
  • Re: 'oy'naQ (Tue Mar 16 14:03:38 2004)
  • Re: multiple verb suffixes (Tue Mar 16 14:24:34 2004)
  • Re: 'oy'naQ (Wed Mar 17 10:39:22 2004)
  • mush vISush (Wed Mar 17 10:39:51 2004)
  • Re: 'oy'naQ: painstik or painstick? (Wed Mar 17 10:44:04 2004)
  • Re: -Daq on numbers? (Wed Mar 17 10:57:07 2004)
  • Re: -Daq on numbers? (Wed Mar 17 12:33:26 2004)
  • Re: headless {-bogh}? (Wed Mar 17 13:39:27 2004)
  • Re: -Daq on numbers? (Wed Mar 17 14:06:26 2004)
  • Re: multiple verb suffixes (Thu Mar 18 12:45:38 2004)
  • Re: Imperatives with {-eghmoH}, round 2 (Thu Mar 18 12:47:45 2004)
  • Re: [ooklingon] Microsoft Aims to Double Windows Language Versions] (Fri Mar 19 12:58:42 2004)
  • Re: B SoH A'e' (Fri Mar 19 13:10:12 2004)
• Mark J. Reed
  • Re: KLBC (Fri Mar 12 07:29:00 2004)
  • Re: Couple of translations needed (Thu Mar 18 20:07:01 2004)
  • Re: <<'e'>> DIpvaD tammey je (Mon Mar 29 21:03:44 2004)
• MorphemeAddict
  • chuv (Mon Mar 01 08:39:16 2004)
  • totally predictable words in tkd+addendum (Mon Mar 01 09:29:25 2004)
  • less predictable compound words in tkd+addendum (Mon Mar 01 12:11:51 2004)
  • bang (Fri Mar 05 07:15:38 2004)
  • Re: tlhIngan-Hol Digest 6 Mar 2004 06:00:00 -0000 Issue 2866 (Sat Mar 06 05:50:01 2004)
  • KLBC missed messages (Sun Mar 07 18:59:49 2004)
  • imperatives of verbs of quality (Mon Mar 08 06:33:27 2004)
  • tlhoyHa' (Mon Mar 08 07:30:52 2004)
  • phantom words (Mon Mar 08 08:15:47 2004)
  • if not {pemHov},... (Mon Mar 08 09:03:40 2004)
  • phantom words (Mon Mar 08 09:24:45 2004)
  • constellation name (Tue Mar 09 15:44:17 2004)
  • Re: {Hov'a'} pagh {Hov'a'}be'? (Tue Mar 09 16:15:58 2004)
  • partially analyzable words in tkd (Tue Mar 09 18:35:38 2004)
  • partially analyzable words in tkd (resent) (Tue Mar 09 19:33:28 2004)
  • unanalyzable words in tkd (Tue Mar 09 19:35:00 2004)
  • Qum SeHlaw (Tue Mar 09 21:11:25 2004)
  • {pu'} as spike (Tue Mar 09 21:30:01 2004)
  • ja'chuq (Tue Mar 09 23:47:31 2004)
  • some unanalyzable words in tkd ftb analyzable (somewhat) (Tue Mar 09 23:56:30 2004)
  • Re: mu' 'ay' <jon>: qunHeyDaj (Wed Mar 10 00:24:32 2004)
  • grammar? btw: please change subject lines! (Thu Mar 11 15:08:35 2004)
  • sun vs. star (Fri Mar 12 05:13:05 2004)
  • imperatives of verbs of state (round 2) (Fri Mar 12 18:44:17 2004)
  • Re: imperatives of verbs of state (round 2) (Sat Mar 13 13:37:14 2004)
  • "errors" in pojwI' (Sun Mar 14 13:27:35 2004)
  • multiple verb suffixes (Sun Mar 14 18:20:58 2004)
  • headless {-bogh}? (Sun Mar 14 23:37:01 2004)
  • 'oy'naQ (Tue Mar 16 04:34:16 2004)
  • Re: 'oy'naQ: painstik or painstick? (Tue Mar 16 15:39:15 2004)
  • -Daq on numbers? (Tue Mar 16 16:42:04 2004)
  • Re: SeQpIr pupqa'moHghach (Wed Mar 17 20:28:01 2004)
  • Re: Flexibility of law'/puS (Thu Mar 18 04:17:41 2004)
  • B SoH A'e' (Fri Mar 19 04:16:08 2004)
  • nuq mu' 'ej nuq ngoQvaD? (Fri Mar 19 04:16:20 2004)
  • jIghoj (Sat Mar 20 00:13:06 2004)
  • english prepositionless equivalents of transitive verbs with prepositions (Fri Mar 26 05:39:59 2004)
  • about (Sat Mar 27 20:37:52 2004)
  • Re: about (Sat Mar 27 21:12:53 2004)
  • Re: about (Sat Mar 27 21:41:26 2004)
  • Human Hol rur'a' tlhIngan Hol (Sat Mar 27 23:35:47 2004)
  • Re: about (Sun Mar 28 02:54:47 2004)
  • it; SIS (Sun Mar 28 19:53:49 2004)
  • language change or inappropriate description? (Tue Mar 30 04:48:21 2004)
  • self-evident? (Tue Mar 30 04:53:01 2004)
  • nuq ja' 'Iv? (Tue Mar 30 05:38:13 2004)
  • lojmItDaq puqbe'wI' vIlegh. (Tue Mar 30 06:04:41 2004)
  • groan (Wed Mar 31 05:17:03 2004)
  • ghunchu'wI' QIn vIyajmeH QaH vIpoQbej. (Wed Mar 31 05:48:16 2004)
  • Re: it; SIS (Wed Mar 31 08:52:50 2004)
  • reH 'e' Daqap (Wed Mar 31 09:08:18 2004)
• Pillow
  • Re: Klingon (and Elvish) in the news (Wed Mar 03 20:18:30 2004)
  • tu'taHghachHey/ KLBC (Sun Mar 14 19:04:34 2004)
• proprinting
  • Still Here (Mon Mar 29 08:29:59 2004)
• qe'San \(Jon Brown\)
  • Re: it; SIS (Mon Mar 29 23:08:25 2004)
  • Re: it; SIS (Tue Mar 30 22:40:06 2004)
  • Re: it; SIS (Wed Mar 31 23:10:47 2004)
• QeS lagh
  • law'/puS DIpvaD tam <'e'> je (Mon Mar 01 14:28:52 2004)
  • Re: law'/puS DIpvaD tam <'e'> je (Mon Mar 01 18:17:05 2004)
  • Re: tuj luSpetmey (Mon Mar 01 18:51:23 2004)
  • MSN jabbI'ID labwI' lo'wI'pu' (Mon Mar 01 21:06:05 2004)
  • Re: <<roD Huch Hutlh cha'maH ben ghojwI' je>> (Tue Mar 02 18:06:43 2004)
  • Re: MSN jabbI'ID labwI' lo'wI'pu' (Tue Mar 02 18:13:10 2004)
  • Re: <<roD Huch Hutlh cha'maH ben ghojwI' je>> (Tue Mar 02 23:53:00 2004)
  • luSpet <<ghor>> qechmey (Wed Mar 03 06:20:22 2004)
  • Re: <<roD Huch Hutlh cha'maH ben ghojwI' je>> (Wed Mar 03 06:47:23 2004)
  • Re: luSpet <<ghor>> qechmey (Fri Mar 05 16:53:40 2004)
  • <<'e'>> DIpvaD tammey je (Fri Mar 05 23:36:38 2004)
  • {Hov'a'} pagh {Hov'a'}be'? (Tue Mar 09 02:50:12 2004)
  • Re: if not {pemHov}... (Tue Mar 09 05:11:08 2004)
  • Re: {Hov'a'} pagh {Hov'a'}be' (Tue Mar 09 19:48:17 2004)
  • mu' 'ay' <jon>: qunHeyDaj (Tue Mar 09 23:50:39 2004)
  • Re: partially analyzable words in tkd (Wed Mar 10 00:12:27 2004)
  • Re: {Hov'a'} pagh {Hov'a'}be' (Wed Mar 10 14:40:34 2004)
  • Re: tuj luSpetmey (Wed Mar 10 23:32:15 2004)
  • Re: KLBC {chennISmoH} (Sun Mar 14 16:43:53 2004)
  • Re: Imperatives with {-eghmoH}, round 2 (Sun Mar 14 17:00:00 2004)
  • Re: Imperatives with {-eghmoH}, round 2 (Mon Mar 15 07:03:14 2004)
  • Re: headless {-bogh}? (Mon Mar 15 07:23:18 2004)
  • Re: Imperatives with {-eghmoH}, round 2 (Mon Mar 15 14:04:17 2004)
  • Re: Imperatives with {-eghmoH}, round 2 (Tue Mar 16 00:09:28 2004)
  • Re: Imperatives with {-eghmoH}, round 2 (Tue Mar 16 13:12:58 2004)
  • Re: Klingon (and Elvish) in the news (Tue Mar 16 23:46:28 2004)
  • Re: -Daq on numbers? (Wed Mar 17 14:25:20 2004)
  • SeQpIr pupqa'moHghach (Wed Mar 17 15:07:50 2004)
  • Re: -Daq on numbers? (Wed Mar 17 15:10:30 2004)
  • Re: SeQpIr pupqa'moHghach (Wed Mar 17 23:12:07 2004)
  • Flexibility of law'/puS (was Re: SeQpIr pupqa'moHghach) (Thu Mar 18 00:11:45 2004)
  • Re: Rank List (Fri Mar 19 04:42:04 2004)
  • Re: Rank List (Fri Mar 19 16:54:50 2004)
  • Re: nuq mu' 'ej nuq ngoQvaD and KLBC (Fri Mar 19 17:45:40 2004)
  • Re: [ooklingon] Microsoft Aims to Double Windows Language Versions] (Sat Mar 20 00:10:42 2004)
  • RE: Using object prefixes with "intransitive" verbs (Fri Mar 26 06:11:10 2004)
  • Re: Using object prefixes with "intransitive" verbs (Fri Mar 26 06:26:08 2004)
  • RE: Using object prefixes with "intransitive" verbs (Fri Mar 26 15:05:42 2004)
  • qIDmey {Haiku}mey je (Fri Mar 26 15:21:12 2004)
  • qIDmey {Haiku}mey je (Fri Mar 26 15:25:41 2004)
  • Re: That's not canon (Fri Mar 26 15:38:05 2004)
  • RE: Klingon WOTD: jat (v) (Sat Mar 27 06:44:00 2004)
  • Re: <<'e'>> DIpvaD tammey je (Sat Mar 27 16:59:04 2004)
  • Re: about (Sat Mar 27 23:05:06 2004)
  • Re: qIDmey {Haiku}mey je (Mon Mar 29 12:22:19 2004)
  • Re: Using object prefixes with "intransitive" verbs (Tue Mar 30 04:52:22 2004)
  • Re: -Daq, subject, object (Tue Mar 30 05:06:05 2004)
  • Re: -Daq, subject, object (Tue Mar 30 19:29:36 2004)
  • Re: qIDmey {Haiku}mey je (Tue Mar 30 19:31:33 2004)
  • Re: about (Tue Mar 30 19:35:30 2004)
  • Re: Using object prefixes with "intransitive" verbs (Tue Mar 30 23:38:26 2004)
  • Re: Using object prefixes with "intransitive" verbs (Wed Mar 31 01:11:03 2004)
  • Page of problems for KLI Wiki (was Re: lojmItDaq puqbe'wI' vIleghpu') (Wed Mar 31 03:26:56 2004)
  • Re: Using object prefixes with "intransitive" verbs (Wed Mar 31 14:15:28 2004)
• qlingon
  • RE: Welsh National Anthem (KLBC?) (Wed Mar 10 05:47:20 2004)
• Qov
  • Re: what does 'orwI' do? (Tue Mar 02 08:30:53 2004)
  • pIqaD (Mon Mar 08 18:12:08 2004)
  • Opinions needed on Klingon pIqaD keyboard mapping (Sun Mar 14 22:46:47 2004)
  • De'wI' patmey (Thu Mar 25 18:21:46 2004)
• QuljIb
  • Re: law'/puS DIpvaD tam <'e'> je (Tue Mar 02 04:55:29 2004)
  • RE: MSN jabbI'ID labwI' lo'wI'pu' (Tue Mar 02 07:27:07 2004)
  • Re: law'/puS DIpvaD tam <'e'> je (Tue Mar 02 18:17:09 2004)
  • Re: <<roD Huch Hutlh cha'maH ben ghojwI' je>> (Tue Mar 02 18:34:07 2004)
  • Re: <<roD Huch Hutlh cha'maH ben ghojwI' je>> (Wed Mar 03 05:04:28 2004)
  • Re: <<roD Huch Hutlh cha'maH ben ghojwI' je>> (Wed Mar 03 16:46:17 2004)
  • Re: <<roD Huch Hutlh cha'maH ben ghojwI' je>> (Wed Mar 03 17:06:31 2004)
  • Re: Did Hoch, now pagh... (Sun Mar 07 16:01:55 2004)
  • possible proverb (Sun Mar 07 19:36:03 2004)
  • Re: possible proverb (Mon Mar 08 07:27:19 2004)
  • Re: {Hov'a'} pagh {Hov'a'}be'? (Tue Mar 09 12:32:37 2004)
  • Re: partially analyzable words in tkd (Tue Mar 09 21:53:41 2004)
  • RE: Klingon WOTD: yIQ (v) (Wed Mar 17 05:26:01 2004)
  • Re: Using object prefixes with "intransitive" verbs (Mon Mar 29 08:32:53 2004)
  • "Benefactives" (was:Re: Using object prefixes with "intransitive" verbs) (Tue Mar 30 05:55:47 2004)
• qurgh
  • Re: [ooklingon] Microsoft Aims to Double Windows Language Versions] (Fri Mar 19 13:14:25 2004)
• qurgh lungqIj
  • RE: if not {pemHov},... (Tue Mar 09 05:10:19 2004)
  • Chatting/Emailing in pIqaD (Sat Mar 13 18:31:45 2004)
• Quvar
  • Re: geography (Mon Mar 01 08:53:55 2004)
  • Re: RE: Segh Soch mojaq <<-pu'>> (Mon Mar 01 11:00:47 2004)
  • Re: geography (Mon Mar 01 17:13:28 2004)
  • Re: geography (Mon Mar 01 17:13:32 2004)
  • Re: chuv (Mon Mar 01 17:13:35 2004)
  • Re: chuv (Mon Mar 01 17:13:53 2004)
  • Re: Klingon WOTD: lIghon (n) (Mon Mar 01 17:13:54 2004)
  • Re: law'/puS DIpvaD tam <'e'> je (Mon Mar 01 17:13:57 2004)
  • Re: tuj luSpetmey (Mon Mar 01 17:32:49 2004)
  • Re: law'/puS DIpvaD tam <'e'> je (Tue Mar 02 04:04:08 2004)
  • Re: tuj luSpetmey (Tue Mar 02 04:04:08 2004)
  • Re: MSN jabbI'ID labwI' lo'wI'pu' (Tue Mar 02 04:04:10 2004)
  • Re: chuv (Tue Mar 02 18:26:52 2004)
  • Re: RE: Klingon Honor Guard-Klbc (Tue Mar 02 18:26:52 2004)
  • Re: tuj luSpetmey (Wed Mar 03 06:54:57 2004)
  • Re: Did Hoch, now pagh... (Sun Mar 07 14:57:38 2004)
  • Re: STOP SENDING ME THIS KLINGON STUFF (Sun Mar 07 14:57:40 2004)
  • Re: if not {pemHov},... (Tue Mar 09 01:39:09 2004)
  • Re: pIqaD (Tue Mar 09 01:39:09 2004)
  • Re: tlhoyHa' (Wed Mar 10 04:02:06 2004)
  • Re: unanalyzable words in tkd (Wed Mar 10 04:02:12 2004)
• Regina Reusser
  • Re: pIqaD (Wed Mar 10 15:03:22 2004)
  • Re: mush vISush (Wed Mar 17 15:08:48 2004)
  • Re: Unscrewed-qa' (Thu Mar 25 00:11:23 2004)
  • Re: tetlhvamDaq Hoch nuvpu' /everyone on this list (Thu Mar 25 04:17:59 2004)
  • Re: tetlhvamDaq Hoch nuvpu' /everyone on this list (Thu Mar 25 11:01:51 2004)
  • Re: tetlhvamDaq Hoch nuvpu' /everyone on this list (Thu Mar 25 13:21:53 2004)
  • Re: Using object prefixes with "intransitive" verbs (Thu Mar 25 13:39:44 2004)
• RNButler2
  • Klingon Honor Guard-Klbc (Tue Mar 02 12:54:15 2004)
  • Re: Klingon Honor Guard-Klbc (Tue Mar 02 16:38:18 2004)
• RomeoRomanc
  • Re: Klingon Honor Guard (Fri Mar 05 15:18:58 2004)
  • STOP SENDING ME KLINGON STUFF (Fri Mar 05 15:19:46 2004)
  • STOP SENDING ME THIS KLINGON STUFF (Fri Mar 05 15:20:45 2004)
• ruehli
  • Re: Opinions needed on Klingon pIqaD keyboard mapping (Tue Mar 16 12:13:49 2004)
• Scott Willis
  • Re: <<roD Huch Hutlh cha'maH ben ghojwI' je>> (Tue Mar 02 20:06:11 2004)
  • Re: <<roD Huch Hutlh cha'maH ben ghojwI' je>> (Wed Mar 03 19:32:07 2004)
  • Re: jIH much chu' (Fri Mar 05 07:30:45 2004)
  • Re: use of 'e' in to-be construction (Sat Mar 06 04:34:10 2004)
  • pegh mu'? (Sat Mar 06 07:23:13 2004)
  • Re: possible proverb (Mon Mar 08 05:29:42 2004)
  • Re: KLBC missed messages (Mon Mar 08 05:35:33 2004)
  • Re: Welsh National Anthem (KLBC?) (Mon Mar 08 07:02:28 2004)
  • Re: Welsh National Anthem (KLBC?) (Mon Mar 08 09:50:58 2004)
  • Re: unanalyzable words in tkd (Wed Mar 10 11:52:48 2004)
  • Re: koi baat nahin (Thu Mar 11 16:44:58 2004)
  • Re: KLBC {chennISmoH} (Fri Mar 12 17:11:36 2004)
  • Re: KLBC Prefix trick (Mon Mar 15 06:06:39 2004)
  • Re: multiple verb suffixes (Mon Mar 15 18:49:02 2004)
  • Re: tu'taHghachHey/ KLBC (Tue Mar 16 06:52:09 2004)
  • Re: Imperatives with {-eghmoH}, round 2 (Tue Mar 16 06:58:05 2004)
  • Re: tu'taHghachHey/ KLBC (Tue Mar 16 07:09:58 2004)
  • Re: 'oy'naQ (Tue Mar 16 07:13:46 2004)
  • Re: KLBC numbering (Tue Mar 16 07:26:00 2004)
  • Re: multiple verb suffixes (Tue Mar 16 07:33:30 2004)
  • Re: nuq mu' 'ej nuq ngoQvaD and KLBC (Sun Mar 21 05:29:30 2004)
  • Re: Using object prefixes with "intransitive" verbs (Sat Mar 27 06:35:39 2004)
  • Re: Unscrewed-qa' (Sat Mar 27 07:04:27 2004)
  • Re: Unscrewed-qa' / KLBC (Sat Mar 27 07:12:59 2004)
  • Re: tetlhvamDaq Hoch nuvpu' /everyone on this list (Sat Mar 27 07:32:41 2004)
  • Re: about (Tue Mar 30 05:05:46 2004)
  • Re: -Daq, subject, object (Tue Mar 30 05:41:43 2004)
• Se'noj le'umaS
  • RE: Klingon Honor Guard-Klbc (Tue Mar 02 14:53:51 2004)
  • (no subject) (Sat Mar 06 01:32:07 2004)
  • Rank List (Fri Mar 19 01:38:35 2004)
  • Re: Rank List (Fri Mar 19 15:30:19 2004)
  • Re: Rank List (Fri Mar 19 20:13:18 2004)
  • RE: Klingon WOTD: jat (v) (Sat Mar 27 05:30:38 2004)
• Shamammd
  • Re: if not {pemHov},... (Tue Mar 09 05:05:25 2004)
  • Re: if not {pemHov},... (Tue Mar 09 05:27:06 2004)
  • Re: unanalyzable words in tkd (Wed Mar 10 06:36:57 2004)
  • Re: unanalyzable words in tkd (Wed Mar 10 08:23:49 2004)
  • Re: unanalyzable words in tkd (Wed Mar 10 10:19:11 2004)
  • Re: unanalyzable words in tkd (Wed Mar 10 12:05:46 2004)
  • Re: KLBC (Wed Mar 10 12:33:38 2004)
  • Re: unanalyzable words in tkd (Wed Mar 10 15:31:20 2004)
  • Re: unanalyzable words in tkd (Wed Mar 10 17:58:37 2004)
  • Re: koi baat nahin (Wed Mar 10 22:33:52 2004)
  • KLBC (Fri Mar 12 05:16:39 2004)
  • Re: KLBC (Fri Mar 12 06:34:55 2004)
  • Re: KLBC (Fri Mar 12 07:00:03 2004)
  • Re: imperatives of verbs of state (round 2) (Sat Mar 13 15:34:00 2004)
  • Re: "errors" in pojwI' (Sun Mar 14 18:54:46 2004)
  • Re: Imperatives with {-eghmoH}, round 2 (Sun Mar 14 19:27:19 2004)
  • Re: tu'taHghachHey/ KLBC (Sun Mar 14 20:26:27 2004)
  • Re: Imperatives with {-eghmoH}, round 2 (Sun Mar 14 20:32:16 2004)
  • Re: tu'taHghachHey/ KLBC (Sun Mar 14 20:53:58 2004)
  • Re: Imperatives with {-eghmoH}, round 2 (Sun Mar 14 20:56:34 2004)
  • Re: Imperatives with {-eghmoH}, round 2 (Mon Mar 15 11:44:22 2004)
  • Re: Imperatives with {-eghmoH}, round 2 (Mon Mar 15 17:24:01 2004)
  • prefix trick (Mon Mar 15 19:14:48 2004)
  • Re: prefix trick / KLBC (Mon Mar 15 22:40:37 2004)
  • lats ghlIngan hol (Tue Mar 16 05:29:11 2004)
  • Re: lats ghlIngan hol (Tue Mar 16 06:29:39 2004)
  • Re: tu'taHghachHey/ KLBC (Tue Mar 16 07:47:46 2004)
  • Re: Imperatives with {-eghmoH}, round 2 (Tue Mar 16 07:58:00 2004)
  • Re: Imperatives with {-eghmoH}, round 2 (Tue Mar 16 16:19:30 2004)
  • Re: tu'taHghachHey/ KLBC (Tue Mar 16 16:25:37 2004)
  • Re: Imperatives with {-eghmoH}, round 2 (Tue Mar 16 16:33:37 2004)
  • Re: Imperatives with {-eghmoH}, round 2 (Tue Mar 16 16:41:10 2004)
  • Re: Imperatives with {-eghmoH}, round 2 (Tue Mar 16 16:44:53 2004)
  • Re: Klingon WOTD: yIQ (v) (Wed Mar 17 09:28:09 2004)
  • Re: mush vISush (Wed Mar 17 11:44:11 2004)
  • Re: -Daq on numbers? (Wed Mar 17 11:49:53 2004)
  • Re: Imperatives with {-eghmoH}, round 2 (Thu Mar 18 13:23:34 2004)
  • [ooklingon] Microsoft Aims to Double Windows Language Versions] (Thu Mar 18 13:43:33 2004)
  • Re: nuqDaq chaHtaH Hoch (Tue Mar 23 23:35:42 2004)
  • Re: nuqDaq chaHtaH Hoch (Wed Mar 24 10:53:26 2004)
  • Re: Unscrewed-qa' (Wed Mar 24 11:04:11 2004)
  • Re: Unscrewed-qa' (Wed Mar 24 19:43:06 2004)
  • Re: nuqDaq chaHtaH Hoch (Wed Mar 24 23:40:23 2004)
  • Re: Unscrewed-qa' (Wed Mar 24 23:49:37 2004)
  • Re: That's not canon (Thu Mar 25 00:02:03 2004)
  • Re: Unscrewed-qa' / KLBC (Thu Mar 25 00:12:47 2004)
  • tetlhvamDaq Hoch nuvpu' /everyone on this list (Thu Mar 25 02:26:09 2004)
  • Re: tetlhvamDaq Hoch nuvpu' /everyone on this list (Thu Mar 25 02:37:34 2004)
  • Re: tetlhvamDaq Hoch nuvpu' /everyone on this list (Thu Mar 25 08:52:10 2004)
  • Re: tetlhvamDaq Hoch nuvpu' /everyone on this list (Thu Mar 25 11:59:47 2004)
  • Re: Using object prefixes with "intransitive" verbs/KLBC (Thu Mar 25 12:11:58 2004)
  • Re: Using object prefixes with "intransitive" verbs (Thu Mar 25 12:41:20 2004)
  • Re: Using object prefixes with "intransitive" verbs (Thu Mar 25 12:53:57 2004)
  • Re: tetlhvamDaq Hoch nuvpu' /everyone on this list (Thu Mar 25 13:52:55 2004)
  • Re: Unscrewed-qa' (Thu Mar 25 13:56:14 2004)
  • Re: That's not canon (Thu Mar 25 14:06:19 2004)
  • Re: That's not canon (Thu Mar 25 14:16:57 2004)
  • Re: nuqDaq chaHtaH Hoch (Thu Mar 25 14:22:30 2004)
  • Re: Using object prefixes with "intransitive" verbs (Thu Mar 25 14:29:22 2004)
  • Re: That's not canon (Thu Mar 25 16:45:08 2004)
  • Re: tetlhvamDaq Hoch nuvpu' /everyone on this list (Fri Mar 26 09:12:23 2004)
  • Re: tetlhvamDaq Hoch nuvpu' /everyone on this list (Sat Mar 27 13:04:57 2004)
  • Re: tetlhvamDaq Hoch nuvpu' /everyone on this list (Mon Mar 29 07:13:57 2004)
  • Re: Using object prefixes with "intransitive" verbs (Mon Mar 29 07:24:48 2004)
  • Re: Using object prefixes with "intransitive" verbs (Tue Mar 30 23:46:37 2004)
  • Re: Using object prefixes with "intransitive" verbs (Wed Mar 31 06:30:42 2004)
  • Re: ghunchu'wI' QIn vIyajmeH QaH vIpoQbej. (Wed Mar 31 17:58:52 2004)
  • Re: it; SIS (Wed Mar 31 21:03:15 2004)
  • Re: ghunchu'wI' QIn vIyajmeH QaH vIpoQbej./KLBC (Wed Mar 31 23:12:30 2004)
  • Re: it; SIS (Wed Mar 31 23:20:37 2004)
  • Re: -Daq with verbs of motion (Wed Mar 31 23:25:50 2004)
• Steven Boozer
  • Re: what does 'orwI' do? (Mon Mar 01 08:17:10 2004)
  • Re: chuv (Mon Mar 01 09:41:02 2004)
  • Re: Pun? (Mon Mar 01 10:12:44 2004)
  • RE: Segh Soch mojaq <<-pu'>> (Mon Mar 01 11:20:41 2004)
  • Re: Klingon WOTD: lIghon (n) (Mon Mar 01 12:05:49 2004)
  • Re: more vector questions (Mon Mar 01 14:08:43 2004)
  • Re: more vector questions (Tue Mar 02 08:56:11 2004)
  • Re: Klingon Honor Guard-Klbc (Tue Mar 02 13:34:22 2004)
  • Re: chuv (Wed Mar 03 08:28:26 2004)
  • Re: Klingon Honor Guard (Wed Mar 03 11:05:06 2004)
  • Re: law'/puS DIpvaD tam <'e'> je (Wed Mar 03 12:35:52 2004)
  • Re: MSN jabbI'ID labwI' lo'wI'pu' (Wed Mar 03 13:32:52 2004)
  • Re: MSN jabbI'ID labwI' lo'wI'pu' (Wed Mar 03 13:46:37 2004)
  • Re: Klingon Honor Guard (Thu Mar 04 09:32:36 2004)
  • Re: MSN jabbI'ID labwI' lo'wI'pu' (Thu Mar 04 13:22:26 2004)
  • Re: {Hov'a'} pagh {Hov'a'}be'? (Tue Mar 09 11:40:32 2004)
  • Re: constellation name (Wed Mar 10 07:23:02 2004)
  • Re: Qum SeHlaw (Wed Mar 10 07:28:00 2004)
  • Re: unanalyzable words in tkd (Wed Mar 10 07:39:03 2004)
  • RE: Welsh National Anthem (KLBC?) (Wed Mar 10 09:12:28 2004)
  • Re: tuj luSpetmey (Thu Mar 11 08:53:54 2004)
  • Re: KLBC numbering (Tue Mar 16 12:56:51 2004)
  • Re: 'oy'naQ (Tue Mar 16 14:37:19 2004)
  • Re: -Daq on numbers? (Wed Mar 17 13:15:48 2004)
  • Re: -Daq on numbers? (Wed Mar 17 14:20:13 2004)
  • Re: -Daq on numbers? (Wed Mar 17 14:45:58 2004)
  • Re: <<'e'>> DIpvaD tammey je (Mon Mar 22 13:15:26 2004)
  • Re: That's not canon (Thu Mar 25 13:44:35 2004)
  • Re: Klingon WOTD: chom (n) (Fri Mar 26 07:31:10 2004)
  • Re: That's not canon (Fri Mar 26 14:46:40 2004)
  • Re: -Daq, subject, object (Tue Mar 30 08:13:20 2004)
  • Re: groan (Wed Mar 31 07:12:06 2004)
  • Re: {tlhob} vs. {ghel} vs. {yu'} (Wed Mar 31 14:54:24 2004)
• Susan Farmer
  • Question about mailing list options (Sun Mar 14 09:13:44 2004)
• Tad Stauffer
  • Re: chuv (Mon Mar 01 12:01:54 2004)
• Teresh000
  • Re: chuv (Mon Mar 01 11:29:32 2004)
  • Re: less predictable compound words in tkd+addendum (Mon Mar 01 14:08:46 2004)
  • jIH much chu' (Fri Mar 05 05:47:13 2004)
  • vItlhob, be'pu'! (Thu Mar 25 09:04:40 2004)
  • Re: about (Wed Mar 31 11:06:27 2004)
• Tyler Fisher
  • Re: more vector questions (Tue Mar 02 09:23:36 2004)
  • RE: Klingon WOTD: jat (v) (Sat Mar 27 05:38:31 2004)
• Will Martin
  • New Words List updates (Sat Mar 06 15:25:44 2004)
• YemQoyaD2
  • Re: about (Sat Mar 27 21:06:59 2004)

Starting: Mon Mar 01 11:33:15 2004
Ending: Sat Mar 27 21:06:59 2004
Number of messages: 589

Back to archive top level