tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Mon Mar 15 16:05:31 2004

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: Imperatives with {-eghmoH}, round 2

David Trimboli ([email protected])

• From: "David Trimboli" <[email protected]>
• Subject: Re: Imperatives with {-eghmoH}, round 2
• Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2004 19:04:50 -0500
• References: <[email protected]>

From: "QeS lagh" <[email protected]>

> 'ach jIjatlhqa': naDev ta' Hol wIjatlh.
> But as I said, we speak {ta' Hol} here.

naDev morISqa' hol vIjats vInechugh, mumevmo 'Iv?  So?  choja'ta'a' lats
ghlIngan hol yIjatsHo'?  wejpu.

lats Sep hol jats vay' nechugh vay', lats Sep hol jatsla, qarchugh.  lats
Sep hol Daqeq Danechugh, holhom chu' yIchenmoHo'!  ghlIngan hol tets'e' 'o
tetsvam; hollIj tets 'obe'.

Have fun!

SuStel
Stardate 4205.3

lats: Okrand pong 'obe' <morISqa'>.  HInvamvaD vI'ogh jI.

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Imperatives with {-eghmoH}, round 2
    • From: "Lieven Litaer" <[email protected]>

• References:
  • Re: Imperatives with {-eghmoH}, round 2
    • From: "QeS lagh" <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: Imperatives with {-eghmoH}, round 2
• Next by Date: Re: Imperatives with {-eghmoH}, round 2
• Previous by thread: Re: Imperatives with {-eghmoH}, round 2
• Next by thread: Re: Imperatives with {-eghmoH}, round 2
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level