tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Tue Mar 16 18:13:07 2004

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: 'oy'naQ: painstik or painstick?

cheesbro ([email protected])

• From: [email protected]
• Subject: Re: 'oy'naQ: painstik or painstick?
• Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2004 21:12:51 -0500 (EST)
• User-agent: IMP/PHP IMAP webmail program 2.2.6

>> It is in TKW as "painstik"
>
>yes, it is, on page 205.  it is also spelled "painstik" in kgt (pp. 65, 177, 
>205) and s32, which is even entitled "Painstiks".  however, it is spelled 
>"painstick" in tkd (pp. 185, 189) and on s9.
>
>my original question should have been more like "is one of the spellings 
>preferred on this list, and why?"

['oy'naQ] maSlu'.  :)
[painstik] lughItlh Human maw'.


DloraH

• Prev by Date: Re: Imperatives with {-eghmoH}, round 2
• Next by Date: http://ar.groups.yahoo.com/group/Rosario_Watchers/
• Previous by thread: Re: 'oy'naQ: painstik or painstick?
• Next by thread: -Daq on numbers?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level