tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Wed Mar 31 22:01:13 2004
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: ghunchu'wI' QIn vIyajmeH QaH vIpoQbej.
- From: [email protected]
- Subject: Re: ghunchu'wI' QIn vIyajmeH QaH vIpoQbej.
- Date: Thu, 1 Apr 2004 01:00:25 EST
qon weQqul
>veqlarghwI' bIH <qatlh>'e' <chay'>'e' je. mu'meylIj rurbe' mu'meywIj 'ach
>cha' mu'meyvam vIDuDtaH. mu'tlheghlIj vIparHa'qu'mo', vIlo' je.
vIta'pu'mo',
>qayIvbe' 'e' vItul. :)
<mu'tlheghlIj vIparHa'qu'mo', vIlo' je.> I think this should have been
written: vIparHa'qu'mo' mu'tlheghlIj'e', vIlo' je. Also, I am not absolutely sure,
but you may need to use the noun on both sides of this sentence.
In another post you mentioned that you used <yIv> because it was listed in
mu'HaqwI' as a slang word meaning to bother or annoy. If this is the case and I
do not know because I do not have mu'HaqwI', then I see no problem with its
use here. Although it wasn't listed in TKD as a slang word, it might be found
elsewhere; possibly in KGT, since it is my understanding that a lot of slang
words are found there. Unfortunately, I do not have that either. The only thing
I can see is that maybe you could have worded this as: "I hope that it
doesn't bother / annoy you that I use / used your sentence.", instead of " Because I
use / used your sentence, I hope that I do not bother / annoy you."
Then again, your sentences may be perfectly fine just the way they are and I
could be wrong about the whole thing. I am sure that if I am, someone will let
us both know soon enough. :)
Qapla'!
nov wamwI'
04/01/2004 00:42 (Local Time)
HovpoH 701358.8