tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Mon Mar 29 07:24:48 2004
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: Using object prefixes with "intransitive" verbs
- From: [email protected]
- Subject: Re: Using object prefixes with "intransitive" verbs
- Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2004 10:24:03 EST
In a message dated 3/29/2004 9:43:11 AM Eastern Standard Time,
[email protected] writes:
<The object of /jaH/, for example, is
always the destination, which is a locative concept. This isn't some
strange rule about /-Daq/; it's just a mention that the object of certain
verbs are already destinations, so there's no need to include /-Daq/ (though
you can add it if you don't mind being redundant). >
qon SuStel
___________________________________________-
Usually when you explain something, I completely understand you and greatly
appreciate the info. However; this time you leave me puzzled. You mentioned
<jaH> ok. In the sentence <pa'lIjDaq yIjaH! > Daq is used. (something I have said
to my daughter more than once here lately.) lol Are you saying that it is
redundant to use it here or am I completely off-mark again?
reH taHjaj tlhIngan Hol!
weQqul
bIjatlhnISchugh, tlhIngan Hol yIjatlh!
HovpoH 701348.1
Stardate 4242.6