tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Tue Mar 02 04:04:08 2004
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: tuj luSpetmey
Am 02.03.2004 03:26:06, schrieb "De'vID jonwI'" <[email protected]>:
>I had thought of this, but I wanted something that could be
>generalized to other exponents.
you asked for squaring, not exponents. ;-)
> For example, A^N might be
One thing I've learned on this list, is the following answer:
We do not know it.
>multiplication, but of course I can't <-'egh> twice. The other
>thing I didn't like about this idea is that <M> is repeated.
In Klingon, many words are repeated. It's not so bad as in english.
>and would be understood by a Klingon, given what we know of
>their mathematics.
it only works because it's nothing new. {M-logh boq'egh M} is just a standard multiplication, and
mentions nothing about squaring and exponents.
>Now, would <N-logh M-logh boq'egh M> be understood as
><N x M x M> or would it be understood as <M^{N+1}> (i.e.
remember that this formula {B-logh boq'egh A} must be understood literally, "A allies with himself B
times". you can't say {-logh} is "x" and go
{cha'logh vaghlogh Hutlogh boq'egh wa'} "2 x 5 x 9 x 1"
Well, perhaps we can, maybe not, I don't know.
>the <N-logh> applies to the <M-logh>)? Or would it not be
>understood at all?
{wejlogh cha'logh vIqIp}
"I hit him twice three times" sounds strange
>problem is that I couldn't disambiguate between the surface
>area of a 3D object and its volume.
Ah! this "area" you mean...
{ghor mI'} "number of surface" might work for this, but then you certainly need to explain what it is
supposed to mean, the literal meaning is nonsense.
--------------------
Now a difficult task for all Klingonists and mathematicians out there:
wa'logh boq'egh wa'; chen nuq??
Quvar.