tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Fri Mar 05 13:39:28 2004

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: Did Hoch, now pagh...

...Paul ([email protected])

• From: "...Paul" <[email protected]>
• Subject: Re: Did Hoch, now pagh...
• Date: Fri, 5 Mar 2004 13:39:13 -0800 (PST)
• In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
• References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>

On Fri, 5 Mar 2004, David Trimboli wrote:
> Ah, I see.  Hmm, yes, that would seem to make sense, in that it parallels
> the possible {X Hoch} idea.  It's all REALLY thin reasoning, though.  *I*
> would accept these constructions, but I cannot say they're right.

qechvam Hoch vIparHa'.  :)

...Paul

 **        Have a question that reality just can't answer?        **
  ** Visit Project Galactic Guide http://www.galactic-guide.com/ **
           "Any sufficiently advanced form of technology
                 is indistinguishable from magic."

• References:
  • Did Hoch, now pagh...
    • From: "...Paul" <[email protected]>
  • Re: Did Hoch, now pagh...
    • From: "David Trimboli" <[email protected]>
  • Re: Did Hoch, now pagh...
    • From: "...Paul" <[email protected]>
  • Re: Did Hoch, now pagh...
    • From: "David Trimboli" <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: The Next Translation?
• Next by Date: Re: Klingon Honor Guard
• Previous by thread: Re: Did Hoch, now pagh...
• Next by thread: Re: Did Hoch, now pagh...
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level