tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Wed Mar 10 04:02:06 2004

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: tlhoyHa'

Quvar ([email protected])

• From: Lieven L. Litaer (Quvar) <[email protected]>
• Subject: Re: tlhoyHa'
• Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2004 12:56:55 +0100

jaj 08.03.2004 rep 16:29:36 ghItlh [email protected]:

>20040227 qon Quvar:
>Does {tlhoyHa'} mean what I think it means?
>
>what do you think it means?  and is it a valid word?  (since not all 
>adverbials can take {-Ha'}.)

Agreed, good to remember that.

I thought of {-Ha'} making the opposite, *tlhoy'Ha'* could mean "do not enough, do too few, to an 
incessive (?) degree"

{*tlhoyHa'* bIqeqmo' bIjatlhchu'be'}
"because you practice too few you do not speak perfectly"

I think in english, one would say "not enough".

Quvar.

• Prev by Date: Re: mu' 'ay' <jon>: qunHeyDaj
• Next by Date: Re: unanalyzable words in tkd
• Previous by thread: tlhoyHa'
• Next by thread: phantom words
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level