tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Tue Mar 02 18:34:07 2004

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]

Re: <<roD Huch Hutlh cha'maH ben ghojwI' je>>

QuljIb ([email protected])



ghItlhpu' QeS lagh:
><<(roD Huch Hutlh cha'maH ben ghojwI' je>>

jIjang. vIghItlh quljIb:
>{mu'tlheghvam Dachenpu'chu'be' vaj vIyajchu'be'.  HIchuH.}
>You did not perfectly form this sentence, thus I don't completely 
>understand it.  Clarify for me.

jang qab wa'leS:
>I thought it was perfectly well-formed:
>
><<roD>> - customarily, as usual (in the correct position)
><<Huch>> - money (conforms to OVS word order)
><<Hutlh>> - lack (proper agreement AFAIK)
><<cha'maH ben ghojwI'>> - twenty year old student (parallels <<cha'vatlh ben 
>HIq>> "two century old wine" (as noted by Dr Okrand, I believe)
><<je>> - also, as well (odd adverb, but in the right position)
>
>The adverb <<je>> is in the right place, at the end of the sentence. I think 
>you might have tripped up on <<cha'maH ben ghojwI'>>; that structure's a 
>little unusual from what I understand.
>
>But I think I was right (if I'm not, can someone point out my mistake?). The 
>sentence was intended to mean "Usually twenty-year-old students lack money, 
>as well."

DaH yIyaj!  the {je} at the end threw me off; I misinterpereted it as a conjunction so I was looking for the second noun-phrase.  chochuHmo' qatlho'.

-quljIb 





Back to archive top level