tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Wed Mar 17 12:33:26 2004

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: -Daq on numbers?

Lieven Litaer ([email protected])

• From: "Lieven Litaer" <[email protected]>
• Subject: Re: -Daq on numbers?
• Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2004 21:32:42 +0100 (MET)
• References: <[email protected]>

> very interesting, since i have been told more than once that it can not be
> used in this way, by more than one person. so you are saying we can use it
> in this way? are you sure? careful! i dont want to start a war here. LOL

It's Marc Okrand who said {qep'a' wejDIchDaq}, so I think we can assume
that's correct. I won't add more to that.

Quvar.

-- 
+++ NEU bei GMX und erstmalig in Deutschland: TÜV-geprüfter Virenschutz +++
100% Virenerkennung nach Wildlist. Infos: http://www.gmx.net/virenschutz

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: -Daq on numbers?
    • From: Steven Boozer <[email protected]>

• References:
  • Re: -Daq on numbers?
    • From: [email protected]

• Prev by Date: Re: -Daq on numbers?
• Next by Date: Re: -Daq on numbers?
• Previous by thread: Re: -Daq on numbers?
• Next by thread: Re: -Daq on numbers?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level