tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Fri Mar 12 06:52:53 2004

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

RE: KLBC

d'Armond Speers, Ph.D. ([email protected])

• From: "d'Armond Speers, Ph.D." <[email protected]>
• Subject: RE: KLBC
• Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2004 07:52:33 -0700
• Importance: Normal
• In-reply-to: <[email protected]>

weQqul
> In a message dated 3/12/2004 9:29:50 AM Eastern Standard Time,
> [email protected] writes:
> However, we know that the words that are listed in TKD as roots +
> suffixes are just that (with the notable exception of {lo'laH}).  So,
> even though {pojwI'} does not indicate that {chenmoHnIS} is an error,
> we know better. yIvoq 'ach yI'ol.
>
> ok so how would you say this then. " I need to create it"

vIchennISmoH

I know it seems confusing, but the suffixes have to be in this order.  It's
ambiguous between "need to cause it to take form" and "cause it to need to
take form."  Same thing with any other word, like ghojnISmoH, mISnISmoH,
etc.

> weQqul

--Holtej
---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.620 / Virus Database: 399 - Release Date: 3/11/2004

• References:
  • Re: KLBC
    • From: [email protected]

• Prev by Date: Re: sun vs. star
• Next by Date: Re: KLBC
• Previous by thread: Re: KLBC
• Next by thread: Re: KLBC {chennISmoH}
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level