tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Fri Mar 26 06:26:08 2004

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: Using object prefixes with "intransitive" verbs

QeS lagh ([email protected])

• From: "QeS lagh" <[email protected]>
• Subject: Re: Using object prefixes with "intransitive" verbs
• Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2004 00:13:39 +1000
• Bcc:

ja' SuStel:

>/pIH/ is used in Conversational Klingon:

>pIpIH
>We've been expecting you.

'e' vISovbe'pu'.

So maybe the semantic domains of {pIH} and {loS} do overlap somewhat: 
{pIpIH} would then be pretty much the same as {pIloS}. Does this sound 
right?

QeS lagh

_________________________________________________________________
What's your house worth? Click here to find out:  
http://www.ninemsn.realestate.com.au

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Using object prefixes with "intransitive" verbs
    • From: "David Trimboli" <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: RE: Using object prefixes with "intransitive" verbs
• Next by Date: Re: tetlhvamDaq Hoch nuvpu' /everyone on this list
• Previous by thread: RE: Using object prefixes with "intransitive" verbs
• Next by thread: Re: Using object prefixes with "intransitive" verbs
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level