tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Wed Mar 31 23:20:37 2004
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: it; SIS
In a message dated 4/1/2004 1:41:53 AM Eastern Standard Time,
[email protected] writes:
Going back to your question now, I would understand this as possibly being
used here in this construct:
'ej maH law' tu'be'lu'.
I don't know though. It looks wierd to me. That doesn't mean it is wrong. It
just looks wierd.
"Someone doesn't find many of us." Yeah! It looks screwy in English too. No
one finds many of us here would work but I don't think that tu'lu' can be
used
in this way, no one vs someone.
Once again, I am not sure and we will just have to wait for someone to let us
know. You bring up a lot of good questions though!
Qapla'!
qon nov wamwI'
--------------------------------------------------------------------
yup! it looks bad! it sounds bad too. lol although you seem to be very
hesitant tonight, i think you are right about this one. instead of marking this KLBC
i think i will leave it open and see what we get from others. BTW so do you!
(bring up good questions) why do you think i bugged you so much to join this
list? :)
reH taHjaj tlhIngan Hol!
weQqul
bIjatlhnISchugh, tlhIngan Hol yIjatlh!
HovpoH 701359.1
Stardate 4249.9