tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Fri Mar 05 17:17:54 2004

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: Did Hoch, now pagh...

Dar'Qang ([email protected])

• From: Dar'Qang <[email protected]>
• Subject: Re: Did Hoch, now pagh...
• Date: Fri, 05 Mar 2004 19:37:09 -0600
• In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
• References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>

At 12:31 AM 3/5/2004, Paul wrote:
>For example, would it make any sense to say */Daj Hol pagh/ to mean
>"Nothing of language is interesting"?

I think that this can also be interpreted as "language number zero is 
interesting",
but probably wouldn't be ambigous in context.

>* Daj Hol pagh  -- Nothing of (about) the language is interesting.

Might be able to use Dajbe' Hol Hoch.



Dar'Qang
bItaghbe'chugh bIrInbe'ba' 

• References:
  • Did Hoch, now pagh...
    • From: "...Paul" <[email protected]>
  • Re: Did Hoch, now pagh...
    • From: "David Trimboli" <[email protected]>
  • Re: Did Hoch, now pagh...
    • From: "...Paul" <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: luSpet <<ghor>> qechmey
• Next by Date: use of 'e' in to-be construction
• Previous by thread: Re: Did Hoch, now pagh...
• Next by thread: Re: Did Hoch, now pagh...
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level