tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Mon Mar 29 18:28:29 2004

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: it; SIS

Lieven L . Litaer ([email protected])

• From: Lieven L. Litaer <[email protected]>
• Subject: Re: it; SIS
• Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2004 04:28:49 +0200
• In-reply-to: <[email protected]>

Am 29.03.2004 16:41:36, schrieb "David Trimboli" <[email protected]>:
>> verbs do not require explicit subjects.  the subject of "SIS" (the sky?)
>may
>> be so self-evident that it is unnecessary in ordinary use.
>
>If it's so self-evident, then what is it?  :)

It's so evident that we don't even need to mention it! ;-)

>We understand how Klingons use the word, without understanding why they use
>it that way.

Do you know how terrans use it? jk. In French they say literally "he rains". Who cares? in Klingon it's just 
{SIS}.

Quvar.

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: it; SIS
    • From: "David Trimboli" <[email protected]>

• References:
  • Re: it; SIS
    • From: "David Trimboli" <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: qIDmey {Haiku}mey je
• Next by Date: Re: it; SIS
• Previous by thread: Re: it; SIS
• Next by thread: Re: it; SIS
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level