tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Mon Mar 15 13:11:12 2004

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: headless {-bogh}?

Lieven Litaer ([email protected])

• From: "Lieven Litaer" <[email protected]>
• Subject: Re: headless {-bogh}?
• Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2004 22:10:25 +0100 (MET)
• References: <[email protected]>

> what is the {-bogh} in the following sentence referring to?
> <Dajatlhbogh vIyajlaHbe'
> I find no match for what you just said. KCD

It's referring to what you just said.

;-)

taQbej mu'tlheghvam.
DaHjaj 'oH QIjlaH pagh 'e' vIHar.

Quvar.

-- 
+++ NEU bei GMX und erstmalig in Deutschland: TÜV-geprüfter Virenschutz +++
100% Virenerkennung nach Wildlist. Infos: http://www.gmx.net/virenschutz

• References:
  • headless {-bogh}?
    • From: [email protected]

• Prev by Date: Re: Opinions needed on Klingon pIqaD keyboard mapping
• Next by Date: Re: Imperatives with {-eghmoH}, round 2
• Previous by thread: headless {-bogh}?
• Next by thread: Re: headless {-bogh}?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level