tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Wed Mar 31 23:12:30 2004

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]

Re: ghunchu'wI' QIn vIyajmeH QaH vIpoQbej./KLBC

Shamammd ([email protected])



In a message dated 4/1/2004 1:04:15 AM Eastern Standard Time, 
[email protected] writes:
I think this should have been 
written: vIparHa'qu'mo' mu'tlheghlIj'e', vIlo' je.  Also, I am not absolutely 
sure, 
but you may need to use the noun on both sides of this sentence.
In another post you mentioned that you used <yIv> because it was listed in 
mu'HaqwI' as a slang word meaning to bother or annoy.  If this is the case 
and I 
do not know because I do not have mu'HaqwI', then I see no problem with its 
use here. Although it wasn't listed in TKD as a slang word, it might be found 
elsewhere; possibly  in KGT, since it is my understanding that a lot of slang 
words are found there. Unfortunately, I do not have that either. The only 
thing 
I can see is that maybe you could have worded this as: "I hope that it 
doesn't bother / annoy you that I use / used your sentence.", instead of " 
Because I 
use / used your sentence, I hope that I do not bother / annoy you."

Then again, your sentences may be perfectly fine just the way they are and I 
could be wrong about the whole thing. I am sure that if I am, someone will 
let 
us both know soon enough. :)
qon nov wamwI'

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-

lol you sound real sure of yourself tonight. Although the example you gave 
sounds good in english, i was going more for the way a klingon might say it by 
using the <vIparHa'qu'mo' ...>. You might be right about the placement of 
mu'tlheghlIj too. I think someone told me this before and i messed up again. lol 
someone told me that while learning a new language you make 5,000 mistakes. 
maybe im trying to make them all real quick and get them over with. maybe i should 
try real hard not to repeat the same ones then, to save time, huh? lol also i 
think i remember someone else telling me something very similar to what you 
did about needing to use the noun on both sides of the sentence, but i dont 
think it was verified. looks like you are right. we have to wait and see what 
others have to say. i appreciate your help and ideas though. :) i think im going 
to mark this KLBC though, since i need to know for sure about the noun thingy 
this time, to keep from making the same mistake over and over.

reh taHjaj tlhIngan Hol!

weQqul
bIjatlhnISchugh, tlhIngan Hol yIjatlh!
If you must speak, speak Klingon!
HovpoH 701359.0
Stardate 4249.9






Back to archive top level