tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Thu Mar 25 14:06:19 2004
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: That's not canon
- From: [email protected]
- Subject: Re: That's not canon
- Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2004 17:05:30 EST
In a message dated 3/25/2004 4:48:30 PM Eastern Standard Time,
[email protected] writes:
Ah, right. That's why it looks odd, because even with <-bogh> a
verb is still a verb. Also, doesn't TKD's description of <-bogh>
make references to its "head noun" without considering the case
where there is no such head noun?
qon De'vID
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
without knowing this, you answered a question i had earlier. What was meant
by, " headless <-bogh> clauses ". So you mean we are supposed to use bogh only
with nouns? then i made another mistake in my writings today. (and i dont know
how to get rid of these squiggly lines) lol. so if i want to say a person who
speaks klingon language, i say : tlhIngan Hol jatlhwI'pu'bogh....?
reH taHjaj tlhIngan Hol!
weQqul
bIjatlhnISchugh, tlhIngan Hol yIjatlh!
HovpoH 701332.8
Stardate 4232.5