tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Sat Mar 13 15:34:00 2004
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: imperatives of verbs of state (round 2)
- From: [email protected]
- Subject: Re: imperatives of verbs of state (round 2)
- Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2004 18:33:18 EST
In a message dated 3/13/2004 4:39:50 PM Eastern Standard Time,
[email protected] writes:
but i'm not too concerned about those, beyond noting the corrections. my
concern here is with other people's interpretations of what he says. i just
think that they are being too rigid in this case.
qon lay'tel SIvten
Let me add my two cents worth in this. bIlughchu'! "..other people's
interpretations.." Exactly. No matter what, there will always be disagreement between
people due to individual interpretations. :) batlh bIjatlh.
weQqul
bIjatlhnISchugh, tlhIngan Hol yIjatlh!
HovpoH 701283.8
Stardate 4199.8