tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Tue Mar 02 04:04:10 2004
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: MSN jabbI'ID labwI' lo'wI'pu'
Am 02.03.2004 06:05:20, schrieb "QeS lagh" <[email protected]>:
>tlhIngan Hol vIjatlhlaHchu'be', 'ach tlhIngan Hol boghItlh boneHchugh 'ej
>"Hotmail" bolo'chugh, jIHvaD jabbI'ID pelI'.
yI-
*machtun* vIparmo' *QIntuj* vIpar 'ej 'oH vIlo'Qo'. *qanej* (ICQ) vIlo' jIH. tay'laH'a' mIwmeyvetlh?
><<wa'Hu' nIvnavwIjDaq mIl'oD vIbachpu'.
You fired a bear into your pajamas?
;-)
The object of {bach} is the projectile:
{pe'vIl mu'qaDmey tIbach}
"curse well"
lit. "shoot cureses forcefully" (TKW)
one "shoots AT a target" {DoSDaq bach}:
{logh veQDaq bachchugh, yoH 'e' toblaHbe' SuvwI'.}
"Shooting space garbage is no test of a warrior's mettle"
lit. "if he shoots a space-garbage" (ST5 or KGT)
2nd:
Maybe it is, maybe not:
The cat-in-the-hat problem.
It's okay if you mean
{wa'Hu' ; nIvnavwIjDaq ; mIl'oD vIleghpu'}
in the pajamas, I saw the bear
but not if your read
{wa'Hu' ; nIvnavwIjDaq mIl'oD ; vIleghpu'}
I saw a "bear in pajamas"
So I'd say your whole sentence as
{wa'Hu' nIvnavwIj tuQbogh mIl'oDDaq jIbachpu'.}
"yesterday I shot at a bear (who was) wearing my pajamas"
>chay' nIvnavwIj tuQ mIl'oD?
>vISovbe'.>> - Groucho Marx
{jISovbe'} avoids any problems
[briefly: vI- only works using 'e', but that doesn't work with chay' - got it?]
>('ach vImughchu'be'; not mIl'oD legh Groucho Marx 'e' vISuDqu'. :D)
ghotvetlh vISovbe'. Hol vIbuS neH.
Maybe I've gone a bit into detail again, I just felt doing so this morning, so no offense. ;-)
Quvar.