tlhIngan-Hol Mailing List Archive by Date: March 2004

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

Starting: Mon Mar 01 08:17:10 2004
Ending: Wed Mar 31 23:56:33 2004
Number of messages: 589

Re: what does 'orwI' do? (Steven Boozer) - Mon Mar 01 08:17:10 2004
chuv (MorphemeAddict) - Mon Mar 01 08:39:16 2004
Re: geography (Quvar) - Mon Mar 01 08:53:55 2004
totally predictable words in tkd+addendum (MorphemeAddict) - Mon Mar 01 09:29:25 2004
Re: chuv (Steven Boozer) - Mon Mar 01 09:41:02 2004
Re: Pun? (Steven Boozer) - Mon Mar 01 10:12:44 2004
Re: RE: Segh Soch mojaq <<-pu'>> (Quvar) - Mon Mar 01 11:00:47 2004
Re: chuv (David Trimboli) - Mon Mar 01 11:12:44 2004
RE: Segh Soch mojaq <<-pu'>> (Steven Boozer) - Mon Mar 01 11:20:41 2004
Re: geography (David Trimboli) - Mon Mar 01 11:29:00 2004
Re: chuv (Teresh000) - Mon Mar 01 11:29:32 2004
Re: chuv (...Paul) - Mon Mar 01 11:33:15 2004
Re: geography (De'vID jonwI') - Mon Mar 01 11:38:16 2004
Klingon Language Highlights (De'vID jonwI') - Mon Mar 01 11:38:46 2004
Re: chuv (Tad Stauffer) - Mon Mar 01 12:01:54 2004
Re: Klingon WOTD: lIghon (n) (Steven Boozer) - Mon Mar 01 12:05:49 2004
less predictable compound words in tkd+addendum (MorphemeAddict) - Mon Mar 01 12:11:51 2004
Re: chuv (David Trimboli) - Mon Mar 01 12:28:13 2004
Re: chuv (David Trimboli) - Mon Mar 01 12:30:03 2004
Re: geography (d'Armond Speers, Ph.D.) - Mon Mar 01 13:08:26 2004
Re: The specifics of indefinites (De'vID jonwI') - Mon Mar 01 13:23:00 2004
Re: geography (David Trimboli) - Mon Mar 01 13:38:13 2004
Re: more vector questions (Steven Boozer) - Mon Mar 01 14:08:43 2004
Re: less predictable compound words in tkd+addendum (Teresh000) - Mon Mar 01 14:08:46 2004
law'/puS DIpvaD tam <'e'> je (QeS lagh) - Mon Mar 01 14:28:52 2004
Re: geography (d'Armond Speers, Ph.D.) - Mon Mar 01 15:22:11 2004
Re: less predictable compound words in tkd+addendum (d'Armond Speers, Ph.D.) - Mon Mar 01 15:23:44 2004
Re: more vector questions (De'vID jonwI') - Mon Mar 01 15:53:42 2004
tuj luSpetmey (De'vID jonwI') - Mon Mar 01 15:58:09 2004
Re: geography (Quvar) - Mon Mar 01 17:13:28 2004
Re: geography (Quvar) - Mon Mar 01 17:13:32 2004
Re: chuv (Quvar) - Mon Mar 01 17:13:35 2004
Re: chuv (Quvar) - Mon Mar 01 17:13:53 2004
Re: Klingon WOTD: lIghon (n) (Quvar) - Mon Mar 01 17:13:54 2004
Re: law'/puS DIpvaD tam <'e'> je (Quvar) - Mon Mar 01 17:13:57 2004
Re: tuj luSpetmey (Quvar) - Mon Mar 01 17:32:49 2004
Re: law'/puS DIpvaD tam <'e'> je (QeS lagh) - Mon Mar 01 18:17:05 2004
Re: tuj luSpetmey (De'vID jonwI') - Mon Mar 01 18:26:49 2004
Re: tuj luSpetmey (De'vID jonwI') - Mon Mar 01 18:48:04 2004
Re: tuj luSpetmey (QeS lagh) - Mon Mar 01 18:51:23 2004
Re: tuj luSpetmey (De'vID jonwI') - Mon Mar 01 18:54:29 2004
Re: chuv (Alan Anderson) - Mon Mar 01 19:33:06 2004
Re: chuv (Alan Anderson) - Mon Mar 01 19:33:38 2004
MSN jabbI'ID labwI' lo'wI'pu' (QeS lagh) - Mon Mar 01 21:06:05 2004
Re: law'/puS DIpvaD tam <'e'> je (Quvar) - Tue Mar 02 04:04:08 2004
Re: tuj luSpetmey (Quvar) - Tue Mar 02 04:04:08 2004
Re: MSN jabbI'ID labwI' lo'wI'pu' (Quvar) - Tue Mar 02 04:04:10 2004
Re: law'/puS DIpvaD tam <'e'> je (QuljIb) - Tue Mar 02 04:55:29 2004
Re: tuj luSpetmey (David Trimboli) - Tue Mar 02 06:27:40 2004
Re: law'/puS DIpvaD tam <'e'> je (David Trimboli) - Tue Mar 02 06:33:10 2004
RE: MSN jabbI'ID labwI' lo'wI'pu' (QuljIb) - Tue Mar 02 07:27:07 2004
Re: what does 'orwI' do? (Qov) - Tue Mar 02 08:30:53 2004
Re: more vector questions (Steven Boozer) - Tue Mar 02 08:56:11 2004
Re: more vector questions (Tyler Fisher) - Tue Mar 02 09:23:36 2004
Klingon (and Elvish) in the news (Lawrence Schoen) - Tue Mar 02 11:40:47 2004
Klingon Honor Guard-Klbc (RNButler2) - Tue Mar 02 12:54:15 2004
Re: Klingon Honor Guard-Klbc (Steven Boozer) - Tue Mar 02 13:34:22 2004
RE: Klingon Honor Guard-Klbc (Se'noj le'umaS) - Tue Mar 02 14:53:51 2004
Re: chuv (...Paul) - Tue Mar 02 15:20:04 2004
Re: Klingon Honor Guard-Klbc (RNButler2) - Tue Mar 02 16:38:18 2004
Re: <<roD Huch Hutlh cha'maH ben ghojwI' je>> (QeS lagh) - Tue Mar 02 18:06:43 2004
Re: MSN jabbI'ID labwI' lo'wI'pu' (QeS lagh) - Tue Mar 02 18:13:10 2004
Re: law'/puS DIpvaD tam <'e'> je (QuljIb) - Tue Mar 02 18:17:09 2004
Re: RE: Klingon Honor Guard-Klbc (Quvar) - Tue Mar 02 18:26:52 2004
Re: chuv (Quvar) - Tue Mar 02 18:26:52 2004
Re: <<roD Huch Hutlh cha'maH ben ghojwI' je>> (QuljIb) - Tue Mar 02 18:34:07 2004
Re: law'/puS DIpvaD tam <'e'> je (De'vID jonwI') - Tue Mar 02 18:48:03 2004
Re: tuj luSpetmey (De'vID jonwI') - Tue Mar 02 18:51:10 2004
Re: Klingon Honor Guard (De'vID jonwI') - Tue Mar 02 18:54:58 2004
Dejpu'bogh Hov! (De'vID jonwI') - Tue Mar 02 19:01:11 2004
Re: law'/puS DIpvaD tam <'e'> je (David Trimboli) - Tue Mar 02 19:24:37 2004
Re: <<roD Huch Hutlh cha'maH ben ghojwI' je>> (Scott Willis) - Tue Mar 02 20:06:11 2004
Re: <<roD Huch Hutlh cha'maH ben ghojwI' je>> (QeS lagh) - Tue Mar 02 23:53:00 2004
Re: <<roD Huch Hutlh cha'maH ben ghojwI' je>> (QuljIb) - Wed Mar 03 05:04:28 2004
luSpet <<ghor>> qechmey (QeS lagh) - Wed Mar 03 06:20:22 2004
Re: <<roD Huch Hutlh cha'maH ben ghojwI' je>> (David Trimboli) - Wed Mar 03 06:24:53 2004
Re: <<roD Huch Hutlh cha'maH ben ghojwI' je>> (QeS lagh) - Wed Mar 03 06:47:23 2004
Re: tuj luSpetmey (Quvar) - Wed Mar 03 06:54:57 2004
Re: chuv (Steven Boozer) - Wed Mar 03 08:28:26 2004
Re: Klingon Honor Guard (Steven Boozer) - Wed Mar 03 11:05:06 2004
Re: law'/puS DIpvaD tam <'e'> je (Steven Boozer) - Wed Mar 03 12:35:52 2004
Re: MSN jabbI'ID labwI' lo'wI'pu' (Steven Boozer) - Wed Mar 03 13:32:52 2004
Re: MSN jabbI'ID labwI' lo'wI'pu' (Steven Boozer) - Wed Mar 03 13:46:37 2004
Re: MSN jabbI'ID labwI' lo'wI'pu' (cheesbro) - Wed Mar 03 15:19:13 2004
Re: <<roD Huch Hutlh cha'maH ben ghojwI' je>> (QuljIb) - Wed Mar 03 16:46:17 2004
Re: <<roD Huch Hutlh cha'maH ben ghojwI' je>> (QuljIb) - Wed Mar 03 17:06:31 2004
Re: <<roD Huch Hutlh cha'maH ben ghojwI' je>> (Scott Willis) - Wed Mar 03 19:32:07 2004
Re: tuj luSpetmey (De'vID jonwI') - Wed Mar 03 19:44:46 2004
Re: Klingon (and Elvish) in the news (Pillow) - Wed Mar 03 20:18:30 2004
Re: Klingon Honor Guard (De'vID jonwI') - Wed Mar 03 20:40:58 2004
pojwI' update (d'Armond Speers, Ph.D.) - Thu Mar 04 01:01:19 2004
Re: Klingon Honor Guard (Steven Boozer) - Thu Mar 04 09:32:36 2004
Re: MSN jabbI'ID labwI' lo'wI'pu' (Steven Boozer) - Thu Mar 04 13:22:26 2004
Re: yIHagh! (Alan Anderson) - Thu Mar 04 15:58:11 2004
Did Hoch, now pagh... (...Paul) - Thu Mar 04 16:35:59 2004
Re: Did Hoch, now pagh... (David Trimboli) - Thu Mar 04 17:10:48 2004
Re: Did Hoch, now pagh... (...Paul) - Thu Mar 04 22:31:44 2004
jIH much chu' (Teresh000) - Fri Mar 05 05:47:13 2004
Re: Did Hoch, now pagh... (David Trimboli) - Fri Mar 05 06:43:59 2004
bang (MorphemeAddict) - Fri Mar 05 07:15:38 2004
Re: jIH much chu' (Scott Willis) - Fri Mar 05 07:30:45 2004
The Next Translation? (Jim Fox-Davis) - Fri Mar 05 11:33:59 2004
Re: Did Hoch, now pagh... (...Paul) - Fri Mar 05 13:39:28 2004
Re: Klingon Honor Guard (De'vID jonwI') - Fri Mar 05 15:06:55 2004
Re: Klingon Honor Guard (RomeoRomanc) - Fri Mar 05 15:18:58 2004
STOP SENDING ME KLINGON STUFF (RomeoRomanc) - Fri Mar 05 15:19:46 2004
STOP SENDING ME THIS KLINGON STUFF (RomeoRomanc) - Fri Mar 05 15:20:45 2004
Re: luSpet <<ghor>> qechmey (De'vID jonwI') - Fri Mar 05 16:07:33 2004
Re: luSpet <<ghor>> qechmey (QeS lagh) - Fri Mar 05 16:53:40 2004
Re: Did Hoch, now pagh... (Dar'Qang) - Fri Mar 05 17:17:54 2004
use of 'e' in to-be construction (Dar'Qang) - Fri Mar 05 18:06:18 2004
Re: Did Hoch, now pagh... (Alan Anderson) - Fri Mar 05 19:51:59 2004
<<'e'>> DIpvaD tammey je (QeS lagh) - Fri Mar 05 23:36:38 2004
(no subject) (Se'noj le'umaS) - Sat Mar 06 01:32:07 2004
Re: use of 'e' in to-be construction (Scott Willis) - Sat Mar 06 04:34:10 2004
Re: tlhIngan-Hol Digest 6 Mar 2004 06:00:00 -0000 Issue 2866 (MorphemeAddict) - Sat Mar 06 05:50:01 2004
pegh mu'? (Scott Willis) - Sat Mar 06 07:23:13 2004
Re: Did Hoch, now pagh... (David Trimboli) - Sat Mar 06 09:27:51 2004
Re: Did Hoch, now pagh... (...Paul) - Sat Mar 06 12:03:33 2004
Re: Did Hoch, now pagh... (...Paul) - Sat Mar 06 12:05:25 2004
Re: Did Hoch, now pagh... (David Trimboli) - Sat Mar 06 13:29:17 2004
New Words List updates (Will Martin) - Sat Mar 06 15:25:44 2004
Re: use of 'e' in to-be construction (Dar'Qang) - Sat Mar 06 17:26:43 2004
Re: jIH much chu' (Dar'Qang) - Sat Mar 06 17:35:11 2004
Re: Tao Te Ching Chp. 1 (Agnieszka Solska) - Sun Mar 07 12:32:47 2004
Re: Did Hoch, now pagh... (Quvar) - Sun Mar 07 14:57:38 2004
Re: STOP SENDING ME THIS KLINGON STUFF (Quvar) - Sun Mar 07 14:57:40 2004
Re: Did Hoch, now pagh... (De'vID jonwI') - Sun Mar 07 16:01:23 2004
Re: Did Hoch, now pagh... (QuljIb) - Sun Mar 07 16:01:55 2004
Re: STOP SENDING ME THIS KLINGON STUFF (De'vID jonwI') - Sun Mar 07 16:16:04 2004
Welsh National Anthem (KLBC?) (avarQ, son of gharan) - Sun Mar 07 17:06:14 2004
Re: Did Hoch, now pagh... (...Paul) - Sun Mar 07 18:49:46 2004
KLBC missed messages (MorphemeAddict) - Sun Mar 07 18:59:49 2004
possible proverb (QuljIb) - Sun Mar 07 19:36:03 2004
Re: yuch watlh 'ej Human jat (Agnieszka Solska) - Mon Mar 08 03:46:08 2004
Re: possible proverb (Scott Willis) - Mon Mar 08 05:29:42 2004
Re: KLBC missed messages (Scott Willis) - Mon Mar 08 05:35:33 2004
imperatives of verbs of quality (MorphemeAddict) - Mon Mar 08 06:33:27 2004
Re: Welsh National Anthem (KLBC?) (Scott Willis) - Mon Mar 08 07:02:28 2004
Re: possible proverb (QuljIb) - Mon Mar 08 07:27:19 2004
tlhoyHa' (MorphemeAddict) - Mon Mar 08 07:30:52 2004
RE: Welsh National Anthem (KLBC?) (avarQ, son of gharan) - Mon Mar 08 07:56:40 2004
phantom words (MorphemeAddict) - Mon Mar 08 08:15:47 2004
Re: imperatives of verbs of quality (David Trimboli) - Mon Mar 08 09:02:37 2004
if not {pemHov},... (MorphemeAddict) - Mon Mar 08 09:03:40 2004
phantom words (MorphemeAddict) - Mon Mar 08 09:24:45 2004
RE: Did Hoch, now pagh... (d'Armond Speers, Ph.D.) - Mon Mar 08 09:45:51 2004
Re: Welsh National Anthem (KLBC?) (Scott Willis) - Mon Mar 08 09:50:58 2004
RE: Welsh National Anthem (KLBC?) (avarQ, son of gharan) - Mon Mar 08 10:40:07 2004
Re: imperatives of verbs of quality (Alan Anderson) - Mon Mar 08 11:05:17 2004
Re: tlhingan-hol Digest V1 #14 (Ariba Sultan) - Mon Mar 08 13:15:31 2004
Re: if not {pemHov},... (Dar'Qang) - Mon Mar 08 17:58:37 2004
pIqaD (Qov) - Mon Mar 08 18:12:08 2004
Re: if not {pemHov},... (cheesbro) - Mon Mar 08 18:53:53 2004
Re: if not {pemHov},... (Alan Anderson) - Mon Mar 08 19:07:54 2004
Re: pIqaD (Quvar) - Tue Mar 09 01:39:09 2004
Re: if not {pemHov},... (Quvar) - Tue Mar 09 01:39:09 2004
{Hov'a'} pagh {Hov'a'}be'? (QeS lagh) - Tue Mar 09 02:50:12 2004
Re: if not {pemHov},... (Shamammd) - Tue Mar 09 05:05:25 2004
RE: if not {pemHov},... (qurgh lungqIj) - Tue Mar 09 05:10:19 2004
Re: if not {pemHov}... (QeS lagh) - Tue Mar 09 05:11:08 2004
Re: if not {pemHov},... (Shamammd) - Tue Mar 09 05:27:06 2004
Re: if not {pemHov},... (De'vID jonwI') - Tue Mar 09 10:32:51 2004
Re: if not {pemHov},... (De'vID jonwI') - Tue Mar 09 10:38:49 2004
Re: {Hov'a'} pagh {Hov'a'}be'? (De'vID jonwI') - Tue Mar 09 10:52:06 2004
Re: {Hov'a'} pagh {Hov'a'}be'? (Steven Boozer) - Tue Mar 09 11:40:32 2004
Re: {Hov'a'} pagh {Hov'a'}be'? (QuljIb) - Tue Mar 09 12:32:37 2004
constellation name (MorphemeAddict) - Tue Mar 09 15:44:17 2004
Re: {Hov'a'} pagh {Hov'a'}be'? (MorphemeAddict) - Tue Mar 09 16:15:58 2004
partially analyzable words in tkd (MorphemeAddict) - Tue Mar 09 18:35:38 2004
RE: if not {pemHov},... (Eric Andeen) - Tue Mar 09 19:01:16 2004
partially analyzable words in tkd (resent) (MorphemeAddict) - Tue Mar 09 19:33:28 2004
unanalyzable words in tkd (MorphemeAddict) - Tue Mar 09 19:35:00 2004
Re: pIqaD (Alan Anderson) - Tue Mar 09 19:45:56 2004
Re: {Hov'a'} pagh {Hov'a'}be' (QeS lagh) - Tue Mar 09 19:48:17 2004
Re: partially analyzable words in tkd (De'vID jonwI') - Tue Mar 09 20:39:15 2004
Qum SeHlaw (MorphemeAddict) - Tue Mar 09 21:11:25 2004
Re: unanalyzable words in tkd (De'vID jonwI') - Tue Mar 09 21:28:22 2004
{pu'} as spike (MorphemeAddict) - Tue Mar 09 21:30:01 2004
Re: Qum SeHlaw (De'vID jonwI') - Tue Mar 09 21:31:15 2004
Re: partially analyzable words in tkd (QuljIb) - Tue Mar 09 21:53:41 2004
MUSH is back! (David Trimboli) - Tue Mar 09 22:00:49 2004
ja'chuq (MorphemeAddict) - Tue Mar 09 23:47:31 2004
mu' 'ay' <jon>: qunHeyDaj (QeS lagh) - Tue Mar 09 23:50:39 2004
some unanalyzable words in tkd ftb analyzable (somewhat) (MorphemeAddict) - Tue Mar 09 23:56:30 2004
Re: partially analyzable words in tkd (QeS lagh) - Wed Mar 10 00:12:27 2004
Re: mu' 'ay' <jon>: qunHeyDaj (MorphemeAddict) - Wed Mar 10 00:24:32 2004
Re: tlhoyHa' (Quvar) - Wed Mar 10 04:02:06 2004
Re: unanalyzable words in tkd (Quvar) - Wed Mar 10 04:02:12 2004
RE: Welsh National Anthem (KLBC?) (qlingon) - Wed Mar 10 05:47:20 2004
Re: unanalyzable words in tkd (A4773492) - Wed Mar 10 05:51:43 2004
RE: Welsh National Anthem (KLBC?) (avarQ, son of gharan) - Wed Mar 10 05:57:03 2004
Re: if not {pemHov},... (David Trimboli) - Wed Mar 10 06:30:45 2004
Re: unanalyzable words in tkd (Shamammd) - Wed Mar 10 06:36:57 2004
Re: constellation name (Steven Boozer) - Wed Mar 10 07:23:02 2004
Re: Qum SeHlaw (Steven Boozer) - Wed Mar 10 07:28:00 2004
Re: unanalyzable words in tkd (Steven Boozer) - Wed Mar 10 07:39:03 2004
Re: unanalyzable words in tkd (A4773492) - Wed Mar 10 07:50:26 2004
Re: unanalyzable words in tkd (A4773492) - Wed Mar 10 08:07:35 2004
Re: {Hov'a'} pagh {Hov'a'}be' (David Trimboli) - Wed Mar 10 08:10:47 2004
Re: unanalyzable words in tkd (Shamammd) - Wed Mar 10 08:23:49 2004
March HolQeD (Lawrence Schoen) - Wed Mar 10 08:43:22 2004
RE: Welsh National Anthem (KLBC?) (Steven Boozer) - Wed Mar 10 09:12:28 2004
Re: unanalyzable words in tkd (A4773492) - Wed Mar 10 09:28:01 2004
Re: unanalyzable words in tkd (Shamammd) - Wed Mar 10 10:19:11 2004
Re: unanalyzable words in tkd (A4773492) - Wed Mar 10 11:22:11 2004
Re: unanalyzable words in tkd (Scott Willis) - Wed Mar 10 11:52:48 2004
Re: unanalyzable words in tkd (Shamammd) - Wed Mar 10 12:05:46 2004
Re: KLBC (Shamammd) - Wed Mar 10 12:33:38 2004
Re: tuj luSpetmey (Alan Anderson) - Wed Mar 10 13:33:00 2004
Re: chuv (Alan Anderson) - Wed Mar 10 13:33:00 2004
Re: unanalyzable words in tkd (A4773492) - Wed Mar 10 14:03:03 2004
Re: unanalyzable words in tkd (De'vID jonwI') - Wed Mar 10 14:15:56 2004
Re: pIqaD (Lieven L . Litaer) - Wed Mar 10 14:33:06 2004
Re: {Hov'a'} pagh {Hov'a'}be' (QeS lagh) - Wed Mar 10 14:40:34 2004
Re: unanalyzable words in tkd (De'vID jonwI') - Wed Mar 10 14:50:19 2004
Re: pIqaD (De'vID jonwI') - Wed Mar 10 14:56:05 2004
Re: unanalyzable words in tkd (A4773492) - Wed Mar 10 14:59:43 2004
Re: pIqaD (Regina Reusser) - Wed Mar 10 15:03:22 2004
Re: unanalyzable words in tkd (Shamammd) - Wed Mar 10 15:31:20 2004
Re: unanalyzable words in tkd (A4773492) - Wed Mar 10 15:53:01 2004
koi baat nahin (De'vID jonwI') - Wed Mar 10 15:54:16 2004
Re: unanalyzable words in tkd (De'vID jonwI') - Wed Mar 10 16:05:10 2004
Re: unanalyzable words in tkd (Shamammd) - Wed Mar 10 17:58:37 2004
Re: March HolQeD (Alan Anderson) - Wed Mar 10 18:41:11 2004
Re: pIqaD (Alan Anderson) - Wed Mar 10 19:36:21 2004
Re: koi baat nahin (A4773492) - Wed Mar 10 20:57:29 2004
Re: koi baat nahin (A4773492) - Wed Mar 10 21:38:25 2004
Re: koi baat nahin (A4773492) - Wed Mar 10 21:50:06 2004
Re: koi baat nahin (Shamammd) - Wed Mar 10 22:33:52 2004
Re: tuj luSpetmey (QeS lagh) - Wed Mar 10 23:32:15 2004
Re: koi baat nahin (A4773492) - Thu Mar 11 00:48:11 2004
Re: Klingon Honor Guard (captain kalaa) - Thu Mar 11 04:05:32 2004
Re: tuj luSpetmey (Steven Boozer) - Thu Mar 11 08:53:54 2004
grammar? btw: please change subject lines! (MorphemeAddict) - Thu Mar 11 15:08:35 2004
Re: koi baat nahin (Scott Willis) - Thu Mar 11 16:44:58 2004
Re: Klingon Honor Guard (keltay) - Thu Mar 11 20:16:24 2004
Don't send me any letter ! (Le Nguyen Xuan Dien) - Thu Mar 11 20:25:57 2004
sun vs. star (MorphemeAddict) - Fri Mar 12 05:13:05 2004
KLBC (Shamammd) - Fri Mar 12 05:16:39 2004
RE: KLBC (d'Armond Speers, Ph.D.) - Fri Mar 12 06:25:12 2004
Re: KLBC (Shamammd) - Fri Mar 12 06:34:55 2004
Re: sun vs. star (A4773492) - Fri Mar 12 06:49:33 2004
RE: KLBC (d'Armond Speers, Ph.D.) - Fri Mar 12 06:52:53 2004
Re: KLBC (A4773492) - Fri Mar 12 06:54:54 2004
KLBC (A4773492) - Fri Mar 12 06:57:57 2004
Re: KLBC (Shamammd) - Fri Mar 12 07:00:03 2004
RE: KLBC (d'Armond Speers, Ph.D.) - Fri Mar 12 07:09:19 2004
Re: KLBC (Mark J. Reed) - Fri Mar 12 07:29:00 2004
Re: sun vs. star (Lieven L . Litaer) - Fri Mar 12 09:38:13 2004
RE: KLBC (Eric Andeen) - Fri Mar 12 10:18:50 2004
Re: Did Hoch, now pagh... (De'vID jonwI') - Fri Mar 12 16:39:12 2004
Re: partially analyzable words in tkd (De'vID jonwI') - Fri Mar 12 16:39:51 2004
Re: tuj luSpetmey (De'vID jonwI') - Fri Mar 12 16:40:33 2004
Re: koi baat nahin (De'vID jonwI') - Fri Mar 12 16:42:02 2004
Re: KLBC {chennISmoH} (Scott Willis) - Fri Mar 12 17:11:36 2004
imperatives of verbs of state (round 2) (MorphemeAddict) - Fri Mar 12 18:44:17 2004
Re: KLBC (Lieven L . Litaer) - Fri Mar 12 21:37:16 2004
Re: koi baat nahin (A4773492) - Fri Mar 12 22:36:36 2004
Re: KLI on The Daily Show (captain kalaa) - Sat Mar 13 05:51:41 2004
Re: imperatives of verbs of state (round 2) (David Trimboli) - Sat Mar 13 09:23:33 2004
Re: KLI on The Daily Show (David Trimboli) - Sat Mar 13 09:26:41 2004
Re: KLBC (De'vID jonwI') - Sat Mar 13 10:33:37 2004
Re: imperatives of verbs of state (round 2) (MorphemeAddict) - Sat Mar 13 13:37:14 2004
Re: imperatives of verbs of state (round 2) (Shamammd) - Sat Mar 13 15:34:00 2004
Chatting/Emailing in pIqaD (qurgh lungqIj) - Sat Mar 13 18:31:45 2004
Re: Chatting/Emailing in pIqaD (G. Roderick Singleton) - Sat Mar 13 20:02:00 2004
Question about mailing list options (Susan Farmer) - Sun Mar 14 09:13:44 2004
"errors" in pojwI' (MorphemeAddict) - Sun Mar 14 13:27:35 2004
Re: KLI on The Daily Show (Alan Anderson) - Sun Mar 14 16:26:32 2004
Re: KLBC {chennISmoH} (QeS lagh) - Sun Mar 14 16:43:53 2004
Re: Imperatives with {-eghmoH}, round 2 (QeS lagh) - Sun Mar 14 17:00:00 2004
multiple verb suffixes (MorphemeAddict) - Sun Mar 14 18:20:58 2004
Re: "errors" in pojwI' (Shamammd) - Sun Mar 14 18:54:46 2004
tu'taHghachHey/ KLBC (Pillow) - Sun Mar 14 19:04:34 2004
Re: Imperatives with {-eghmoH}, round 2 (Shamammd) - Sun Mar 14 19:27:19 2004
Re: tu'taHghachHey/ KLBC (Shamammd) - Sun Mar 14 20:26:27 2004
Re: Imperatives with {-eghmoH}, round 2 (Shamammd) - Sun Mar 14 20:32:16 2004
Re: tu'taHghachHey/ KLBC (Shamammd) - Sun Mar 14 20:53:58 2004
Re: Imperatives with {-eghmoH}, round 2 (Shamammd) - Sun Mar 14 20:56:34 2004
Opinions needed on Klingon pIqaD keyboard mapping (Qov) - Sun Mar 14 22:46:47 2004
headless {-bogh}? (MorphemeAddict) - Sun Mar 14 23:37:01 2004
Re: KLBC Prefix trick (Scott Willis) - Mon Mar 15 06:06:39 2004
Re: Opinions needed on Klingon pIqaD keyboard mapping (Christian Einfeldt) - Mon Mar 15 06:29:46 2004
Re: Imperatives with {-eghmoH}, round 2 (QeS lagh) - Mon Mar 15 07:03:14 2004
Re: headless {-bogh}? (QeS lagh) - Mon Mar 15 07:23:18 2004
Re: KLBC Prefix trick (David Trimboli) - Mon Mar 15 09:11:14 2004
Re: headless {-bogh}? (David Trimboli) - Mon Mar 15 09:25:23 2004
Re: Imperatives with {-eghmoH}, round 2 (Shamammd) - Mon Mar 15 11:44:22 2004
Re: KLI on The Daily Show (Lieven Litaer) - Mon Mar 15 12:35:32 2004
Re: Opinions needed on Klingon pIqaD keyboard mapping (Lieven Litaer) - Mon Mar 15 13:05:55 2004
Re: headless {-bogh}? (Lieven Litaer) - Mon Mar 15 13:11:12 2004
Re: Imperatives with {-eghmoH}, round 2 (QeS lagh) - Mon Mar 15 14:04:17 2004
Re: Imperatives with {-eghmoH}, round 2 (David Trimboli) - Mon Mar 15 16:05:31 2004
Re: Imperatives with {-eghmoH}, round 2 (Shamammd) - Mon Mar 15 17:24:01 2004
Re: multiple verb suffixes (Scott Willis) - Mon Mar 15 18:49:02 2004
prefix trick (Shamammd) - Mon Mar 15 19:14:48 2004
Re: multiple verb suffixes (Dar'Qang) - Mon Mar 15 20:47:34 2004
Re: prefix trick / KLBC (A4773492) - Mon Mar 15 22:08:36 2004
Re: prefix trick / KLBC (Shamammd) - Mon Mar 15 22:40:37 2004
Re: Imperatives with {-eghmoH}, round 2 (QeS lagh) - Tue Mar 16 00:09:28 2004
'oy'naQ (MorphemeAddict) - Tue Mar 16 04:34:16 2004
lats ghlIngan hol (Shamammd) - Tue Mar 16 05:29:11 2004
Re: lats ghlIngan hol (Shamammd) - Tue Mar 16 06:29:39 2004
Re: tu'taHghachHey/ KLBC (Scott Willis) - Tue Mar 16 06:52:09 2004
Re: Imperatives with {-eghmoH}, round 2 (Scott Willis) - Tue Mar 16 06:58:05 2004
Re: tu'taHghachHey/ KLBC (Scott Willis) - Tue Mar 16 07:09:58 2004
Re: 'oy'naQ (Scott Willis) - Tue Mar 16 07:13:46 2004
Re: KLBC numbering (Scott Willis) - Tue Mar 16 07:26:00 2004
Re: Imperatives with {-eghmoH}, round 2 (David Trimboli) - Tue Mar 16 07:30:10 2004
Re: multiple verb suffixes (Scott Willis) - Tue Mar 16 07:33:30 2004
Re: tu'taHghachHey/ KLBC (Shamammd) - Tue Mar 16 07:47:46 2004
Re: Imperatives with {-eghmoH}, round 2 (Shamammd) - Tue Mar 16 07:58:00 2004
Re: multiple verb suffixes (...Paul) - Tue Mar 16 08:54:27 2004
Re: Opinions needed on Klingon pIqaD keyboard mapping (ruehli) - Tue Mar 16 12:13:49 2004
Re: KLBC numbering (Steven Boozer) - Tue Mar 16 12:56:51 2004
Re: Imperatives with {-eghmoH}, round 2 (Lieven Litaer) - Tue Mar 16 13:06:30 2004
Re: Imperatives with {-eghmoH}, round 2 (Lieven Litaer) - Tue Mar 16 13:12:14 2004
Re: Imperatives with {-eghmoH}, round 2 (QeS lagh) - Tue Mar 16 13:12:58 2004
Re: tu'taHghachHey/ KLBC (Lieven Litaer) - Tue Mar 16 13:16:16 2004
Re: prefix trick / KLBC (Lieven Litaer) - Tue Mar 16 13:19:48 2004
Dialects on the MUSH (David Trimboli) - Tue Mar 16 13:26:55 2004
Re: multiple verb suffixes (Lieven Litaer) - Tue Mar 16 13:35:08 2004
Re: Imperatives with {-eghmoH}, round 2 (David Trimboli) - Tue Mar 16 13:42:31 2004
Re: multiple verb suffixes (Lieven Litaer) - Tue Mar 16 13:45:56 2004
Re: Imperatives with {-eghmoH}, round 2 (Lieven Litaer) - Tue Mar 16 13:56:18 2004
Re: 'oy'naQ (Lieven Litaer) - Tue Mar 16 14:03:38 2004
Re: multiple verb suffixes (...Paul) - Tue Mar 16 14:07:35 2004
Re: multiple verb suffixes (Lieven Litaer) - Tue Mar 16 14:24:34 2004
Re: 'oy'naQ (Steven Boozer) - Tue Mar 16 14:37:19 2004
Re: multiple verb suffixes (...Paul) - Tue Mar 16 15:30:38 2004
Re: 'oy'naQ: painstik or painstick? (MorphemeAddict) - Tue Mar 16 15:39:15 2004
Re: headless {-bogh}? (De'vID jonwI') - Tue Mar 16 16:01:57 2004
Re: Imperatives with {-eghmoH}, round 2 (Shamammd) - Tue Mar 16 16:19:30 2004
Dialects on the MUSH (David Trimboli) - Tue Mar 16 16:24:00 2004
Re: tu'taHghachHey/ KLBC (Shamammd) - Tue Mar 16 16:25:37 2004
Re: headless {-bogh}? (David Trimboli) - Tue Mar 16 16:33:37 2004
Re: Imperatives with {-eghmoH}, round 2 (Shamammd) - Tue Mar 16 16:33:37 2004
Re: Imperatives with {-eghmoH}, round 2 (Shamammd) - Tue Mar 16 16:41:10 2004
-Daq on numbers? (MorphemeAddict) - Tue Mar 16 16:42:04 2004
Re: Imperatives with {-eghmoH}, round 2 (Shamammd) - Tue Mar 16 16:44:53 2004
Re: 'oy'naQ: painstik or painstick? (cheesbro) - Tue Mar 16 18:13:07 2004
http://ar.groups.yahoo.com/group/Rosario_Watchers/ (RatA KinG) - Tue Mar 16 23:04:24 2004
Re: Klingon (and Elvish) in the news (QeS lagh) - Tue Mar 16 23:46:28 2004
RE: Klingon WOTD: yIQ (v) (QuljIb) - Wed Mar 17 05:26:01 2004
Re: Klingon WOTD: yIQ (v) (Shamammd) - Wed Mar 17 09:28:09 2004
Re: 'oy'naQ (Lieven Litaer) - Wed Mar 17 10:39:22 2004
mush vISush (Lieven Litaer) - Wed Mar 17 10:39:51 2004
Re: 'oy'naQ: painstik or painstick? (Lieven Litaer) - Wed Mar 17 10:44:04 2004
Re: -Daq on numbers? (Lieven Litaer) - Wed Mar 17 10:57:07 2004
Re: mush vISush (Shamammd) - Wed Mar 17 11:44:11 2004
Re: -Daq on numbers? (Shamammd) - Wed Mar 17 11:49:53 2004
Re: -Daq on numbers? (Lieven Litaer) - Wed Mar 17 12:33:26 2004
Re: -Daq on numbers? (Steven Boozer) - Wed Mar 17 13:15:48 2004
Re: headless {-bogh}? (Lieven Litaer) - Wed Mar 17 13:39:27 2004
Re: -Daq on numbers? (Lieven Litaer) - Wed Mar 17 14:06:26 2004
Re: -Daq on numbers? (Steven Boozer) - Wed Mar 17 14:20:13 2004
Re: -Daq on numbers? (QeS lagh) - Wed Mar 17 14:25:20 2004
Re: -Daq on numbers? (Steven Boozer) - Wed Mar 17 14:45:58 2004
SeQpIr pupqa'moHghach (QeS lagh) - Wed Mar 17 15:07:50 2004
Re: mush vISush (Regina Reusser) - Wed Mar 17 15:08:48 2004
Re: -Daq on numbers? (QeS lagh) - Wed Mar 17 15:10:30 2004
Re: SeQpIr pupqa'moHghach (MorphemeAddict) - Wed Mar 17 20:28:01 2004
Re: SeQpIr pupqa'moHghach (QeS lagh) - Wed Mar 17 23:12:07 2004
Flexibility of law'/puS (was Re: SeQpIr pupqa'moHghach) (QeS lagh) - Thu Mar 18 00:11:45 2004
Re: Flexibility of law'/puS (MorphemeAddict) - Thu Mar 18 04:17:41 2004
Re: multiple verb suffixes (Lieven Litaer) - Thu Mar 18 12:45:38 2004
Re: Imperatives with {-eghmoH}, round 2 (Lieven Litaer) - Thu Mar 18 12:47:45 2004
Re: Imperatives with {-eghmoH}, round 2 (Shamammd) - Thu Mar 18 13:23:34 2004
[ooklingon] Microsoft Aims to Double Windows Language Versions] (Shamammd) - Thu Mar 18 13:43:33 2004
Re: multiple verb suffixes (...Paul) - Thu Mar 18 13:45:28 2004
Re: possible proverb (Alan Anderson) - Thu Mar 18 14:07:08 2004
Re: The Next Translation? (Alan Anderson) - Thu Mar 18 14:07:08 2004
Couple of translations needed (Beth Baisch, the tuftedpuffin) - Thu Mar 18 19:07:06 2004
Re: Couple of translations needed (Mark J. Reed) - Thu Mar 18 20:07:01 2004
Re: Couple of translations needed (De'vID jonwI') - Thu Mar 18 20:07:39 2004
Re: Couple of translations needed (De'vID jonwI') - Thu Mar 18 20:26:14 2004
Rank List (Se'noj le'umaS) - Fri Mar 19 01:38:35 2004
B SoH A'e' (MorphemeAddict) - Fri Mar 19 04:16:08 2004
nuq mu' 'ej nuq ngoQvaD? (MorphemeAddict) - Fri Mar 19 04:16:20 2004
Re: Rank List (QeS lagh) - Fri Mar 19 04:42:04 2004
Re: B SoH A'e' (David Trimboli) - Fri Mar 19 05:35:26 2004
Re: KLI on The Daily Show (captain kalaa) - Fri Mar 19 08:04:00 2004
Re: [ooklingon] Microsoft Aims to Double Windows Language Versions] (Lieven Litaer) - Fri Mar 19 12:58:42 2004
Re: B SoH A'e' (Lieven Litaer) - Fri Mar 19 13:10:12 2004
Re: [ooklingon] Microsoft Aims to Double Windows Language Versions] (qurgh) - Fri Mar 19 13:14:25 2004
Re: Rank List (Se'noj le'umaS) - Fri Mar 19 15:30:19 2004
Klingon weapons on South Park (De'vID jonwI') - Fri Mar 19 16:40:09 2004
Re: Rank List (QeS lagh) - Fri Mar 19 16:54:50 2004
Re: nuq mu' 'ej nuq ngoQvaD and KLBC (QeS lagh) - Fri Mar 19 17:45:40 2004
Re: Rank List (Se'noj le'umaS) - Fri Mar 19 20:13:18 2004
Re: [ooklingon] Microsoft Aims to Double Windows Language Versions] (QeS lagh) - Sat Mar 20 00:10:42 2004
jIghoj (MorphemeAddict) - Sat Mar 20 00:13:06 2004
TechTV (d'Armond Speers, Ph.D.) - Sat Mar 20 11:51:45 2004
Re: nuq mu' 'ej nuq ngoQvaD and KLBC (Scott Willis) - Sun Mar 21 05:29:30 2004
Re: <<'e'>> DIpvaD tammey je (Steven Boozer) - Mon Mar 22 13:15:26 2004
nuqDaq chaHtaH Hoch (...Paul) - Tue Mar 23 21:41:55 2004
Re: nuqDaq chaHtaH Hoch (Shamammd) - Tue Mar 23 23:35:42 2004
Unscrewed-qa' (d'Armond Speers, Ph.D.) - Wed Mar 24 06:01:03 2004
Re: nuqDaq chaHtaH Hoch (cheesbro) - Wed Mar 24 10:40:35 2004
Re: nuqDaq chaHtaH Hoch (Shamammd) - Wed Mar 24 10:53:26 2004
Re: Unscrewed-qa' (Shamammd) - Wed Mar 24 11:04:11 2004
RE: Unscrewed-qa' (d'Armond Speers, Ph.D.) - Wed Mar 24 11:26:43 2004
[no subject] (De'vID jonwI') - Wed Mar 24 19:39:32 2004
Re: Unscrewed-qa' (Shamammd) - Wed Mar 24 19:43:06 2004
Re: -Daq on numbers? (De'vID jonwI') - Wed Mar 24 19:51:20 2004
Re: nuqDaq chaHtaH Hoch (De'vID jonwI') - Wed Mar 24 19:52:29 2004
RE: Unscrewed-qa' (De'vID jonwI') - Wed Mar 24 19:53:40 2004
RE: Unscrewed-qa' (d'Armond Speers, Ph.D.) - Wed Mar 24 20:04:37 2004
RE: Unscrewed-qa' (d'Armond Speers, Ph.D.) - Wed Mar 24 20:07:00 2004
That's not canon (David Trimboli) - Wed Mar 24 20:36:55 2004
Re: That's not canon (De'vID jonwI') - Wed Mar 24 22:24:55 2004
Re: nuqDaq chaHtaH Hoch (Shamammd) - Wed Mar 24 23:40:23 2004
Re: Unscrewed-qa' (Shamammd) - Wed Mar 24 23:49:37 2004
Re: That's not canon (Shamammd) - Thu Mar 25 00:02:03 2004
Re: Unscrewed-qa' (Regina Reusser) - Thu Mar 25 00:11:23 2004
Re: Unscrewed-qa' / KLBC (Shamammd) - Thu Mar 25 00:12:47 2004
tetlhvamDaq Hoch nuvpu' /everyone on this list (Shamammd) - Thu Mar 25 02:26:09 2004
Re: tetlhvamDaq Hoch nuvpu' /everyone on this list (Shamammd) - Thu Mar 25 02:37:34 2004
Re: tetlhvamDaq Hoch nuvpu' /everyone on this list (Regina Reusser) - Thu Mar 25 04:17:59 2004
Re: That's not canon (David Trimboli) - Thu Mar 25 06:41:40 2004
Re: tetlhvamDaq Hoch nuvpu' /everyone on this list (Shamammd) - Thu Mar 25 08:52:10 2004
vItlhob, be'pu'! (Teresh000) - Thu Mar 25 09:04:40 2004
Re: tetlhvamDaq Hoch nuvpu' /everyone on this list (Regina Reusser) - Thu Mar 25 11:01:51 2004
Using object prefixes with "intransitive" verbs (Heather Myers) - Thu Mar 25 11:45:06 2004
Re: tetlhvamDaq Hoch nuvpu' /everyone on this list (Shamammd) - Thu Mar 25 11:59:47 2004
Re: Using object prefixes with "intransitive" verbs/KLBC (Shamammd) - Thu Mar 25 12:11:58 2004
Re: Using object prefixes with "intransitive" verbs (David Trimboli) - Thu Mar 25 12:13:59 2004
Re: Using object prefixes with "intransitive" verbs (Shamammd) - Thu Mar 25 12:41:20 2004
Re: Using object prefixes with "intransitive" verbs (Shamammd) - Thu Mar 25 12:53:57 2004
Re: Using object prefixes with "intransitive" verbs (...Paul) - Thu Mar 25 12:56:55 2004
Re: tetlhvamDaq Hoch nuvpu' /everyone on this list (Regina Reusser) - Thu Mar 25 13:21:53 2004
RE: Using object prefixes with "intransitive" verbs (Heather Myers) - Thu Mar 25 13:36:56 2004
Re: Using object prefixes with "intransitive" verbs (Regina Reusser) - Thu Mar 25 13:39:44 2004
Re: Unscrewed-qa' (De'vID jonwI') - Thu Mar 25 13:43:24 2004
Re: That's not canon (Steven Boozer) - Thu Mar 25 13:44:35 2004
Re: That's not canon (De'vID jonwI') - Thu Mar 25 13:45:50 2004
Re: That's not canon (De'vID jonwI') - Thu Mar 25 13:48:29 2004
Re: tetlhvamDaq Hoch nuvpu' /everyone on this list (Shamammd) - Thu Mar 25 13:52:55 2004
Re: Unscrewed-qa' (Shamammd) - Thu Mar 25 13:56:14 2004
Re: nuqDaq chaHtaH Hoch (De'vID jonwI') - Thu Mar 25 13:56:56 2004
Re: That's not canon (Shamammd) - Thu Mar 25 14:06:19 2004
Re: That's not canon (Shamammd) - Thu Mar 25 14:16:57 2004
Re: Using object prefixes with "intransitive" verbs (De'vID jonwI') - Thu Mar 25 14:20:47 2004
Re: nuqDaq chaHtaH Hoch (Shamammd) - Thu Mar 25 14:22:30 2004
Re: Using object prefixes with "intransitive" verbs (Shamammd) - Thu Mar 25 14:29:22 2004
Re: That's not canon (De'vID jonwI') - Thu Mar 25 16:01:25 2004
RE: Using object prefixes with "intransitive" verbs (...Paul) - Thu Mar 25 16:06:22 2004
Re: That's not canon (De'vID jonwI') - Thu Mar 25 16:31:33 2004
Re: That's not canon (Shamammd) - Thu Mar 25 16:45:08 2004
Re: Using object prefixes with "intransitive" verbs (David Trimboli) - Thu Mar 25 17:20:21 2004
De'wI' patmey (Qov) - Thu Mar 25 18:21:46 2004
Re: De'wI' patmey (De'vID jonwI') - Thu Mar 25 20:49:39 2004
HolQeD veb (Lawrence M. Schoen) - Fri Mar 26 04:52:31 2004
english prepositionless equivalents of transitive verbs with prepositions (MorphemeAddict) - Fri Mar 26 05:39:59 2004
RE: Using object prefixes with "intransitive" verbs (QeS lagh) - Fri Mar 26 06:11:10 2004
Re: Using object prefixes with "intransitive" verbs (QeS lagh) - Fri Mar 26 06:26:08 2004
Re: tetlhvamDaq Hoch nuvpu' /everyone on this list (captain kalaa) - Fri Mar 26 06:30:37 2004
Re: Klingon WOTD: chom (n) (Steven Boozer) - Fri Mar 26 07:31:10 2004
Re: tetlhvamDaq Hoch nuvpu' /everyone on this list (Shamammd) - Fri Mar 26 09:12:23 2004
RE: Using object prefixes with "intransitive" verbs (De'vID jonwI') - Fri Mar 26 13:12:20 2004
Re: That's not canon (Steven Boozer) - Fri Mar 26 14:46:40 2004
RE: Using object prefixes with "intransitive" verbs (QeS lagh) - Fri Mar 26 15:05:42 2004
qIDmey {Haiku}mey je (QeS lagh) - Fri Mar 26 15:21:12 2004
qIDmey {Haiku}mey je (QeS lagh) - Fri Mar 26 15:25:41 2004
Re: That's not canon (QeS lagh) - Fri Mar 26 15:38:05 2004
Re: yaH chu' vIghaj (Alan Anderson) - Fri Mar 26 16:23:36 2004
RE: Klingon WOTD: jat (v) (Se'noj le'umaS) - Sat Mar 27 05:30:38 2004
RE: Klingon WOTD: jat (v) (Tyler Fisher) - Sat Mar 27 05:38:31 2004
Re: Using object prefixes with "intransitive" verbs (Scott Willis) - Sat Mar 27 06:35:39 2004
RE: Klingon WOTD: jat (v) (QeS lagh) - Sat Mar 27 06:44:00 2004
Re: Unscrewed-qa' (Scott Willis) - Sat Mar 27 07:04:27 2004
Re: Unscrewed-qa' / KLBC (Scott Willis) - Sat Mar 27 07:12:59 2004
Re: tetlhvamDaq Hoch nuvpu' /everyone on this list (Scott Willis) - Sat Mar 27 07:32:41 2004
Re: Using object prefixes with "intransitive" verbs (David Trimboli) - Sat Mar 27 07:59:31 2004
Re: Unscrewed-qa' (Dar'Qang) - Sat Mar 27 12:52:52 2004
Re: <<'e'>> DIpvaD tammey je (Dar'Qang) - Sat Mar 27 12:58:57 2004
Re: tetlhvamDaq Hoch nuvpu' /everyone on this list (Shamammd) - Sat Mar 27 13:04:57 2004
Re: De'wI' patmey (Dar'Qang) - Sat Mar 27 13:06:35 2004
Re: <<'e'>> DIpvaD tammey je (QeS lagh) - Sat Mar 27 16:59:04 2004
about (MorphemeAddict) - Sat Mar 27 20:37:52 2004
Re: about (YemQoyaD2) - Sat Mar 27 21:06:59 2004
Re: about (MorphemeAddict) - Sat Mar 27 21:12:53 2004
RE: about (d'Armond Speers, Ph.D.) - Sat Mar 27 21:18:00 2004
Re: about (MorphemeAddict) - Sat Mar 27 21:41:26 2004
Re: jIQagh 'ach SachuH (Alan Anderson) - Sat Mar 27 21:45:27 2004
[tlhIngan-Hol] Re: *Lindt* yuch <<qIb lengwI' tlhIngan Hol>> je (Alan Anderson) - Sat Mar 27 21:47:07 2004
Re: mu' chu' DIchenmoHnIS'a'? pagh mu' ngo' DIlo'laH'a'? (Alan Anderson) - Sat Mar 27 21:47:24 2004
[tlhIngan-Hol] Re: tlhingan-hol Digest V1 #2 (Alan Anderson) - Sat Mar 27 21:47:42 2004
Re: [tlhIngan-Hol] Re: Hoch placement (Alan Anderson) - Sat Mar 27 21:48:00 2004
Re: Klingon WOTD: lIghon (n) (Alan Anderson) - Sat Mar 27 21:48:42 2004
Re: geography (Alan Anderson) - Sat Mar 27 21:52:10 2004
Re: Klingon Language Highlights (Alan Anderson) - Sat Mar 27 21:52:10 2004
Re: about (QeS lagh) - Sat Mar 27 23:05:06 2004
Human Hol rur'a' tlhIngan Hol (MorphemeAddict) - Sat Mar 27 23:35:47 2004
Re: about (Lieven L . Litaer) - Sun Mar 28 02:22:34 2004
Re: about (MorphemeAddict) - Sun Mar 28 02:54:47 2004
that (was: That's not canon) (De'vID jonwI') - Sun Mar 28 10:52:18 2004
Re: qIDmey {Haiku}mey je (De'vID jonwI') - Sun Mar 28 10:54:42 2004
RE: Using object prefixes with "intransitive" verbs (De'vID jonwI') - Sun Mar 28 11:23:17 2004
RE: Klingon WOTD: jat (v) (...Paul) - Sun Mar 28 14:17:15 2004
RE: Using object prefixes with "intransitive" verbs (...Paul) - Sun Mar 28 14:33:37 2004
RE: Unscrewed-qa' (Alan Anderson) - Sun Mar 28 19:35:02 2004
it; SIS (MorphemeAddict) - Sun Mar 28 19:53:49 2004
Re: tetlhvamDaq Hoch nuvpu' /everyone on this list (captain kalaa) - Mon Mar 29 04:58:27 2004
Re: about (David Trimboli) - Mon Mar 29 06:24:12 2004
Re: Using object prefixes with "intransitive" verbs (David Trimboli) - Mon Mar 29 06:40:25 2004
Re: it; SIS (David Trimboli) - Mon Mar 29 06:42:18 2004
Re: tetlhvamDaq Hoch nuvpu' /everyone on this list (Shamammd) - Mon Mar 29 07:13:57 2004
Re: Using object prefixes with "intransitive" verbs (Shamammd) - Mon Mar 29 07:24:48 2004
Re: Using object prefixes with "intransitive" verbs (David Trimboli) - Mon Mar 29 07:39:56 2004
Still Here (proprinting) - Mon Mar 29 08:29:59 2004
Re: Using object prefixes with "intransitive" verbs (QuljIb) - Mon Mar 29 08:32:53 2004
Re: Using object prefixes with "intransitive" verbs (cheesbro) - Mon Mar 29 09:14:24 2004
Re: Using object prefixes with "intransitive" verbs (David Trimboli) - Mon Mar 29 10:49:02 2004
Re: qIDmey {Haiku}mey je (QeS lagh) - Mon Mar 29 12:22:19 2004
Re: it; SIS (Lieven L . Litaer) - Mon Mar 29 18:28:29 2004
Re: it; SIS (David Trimboli) - Mon Mar 29 19:57:06 2004
Re: <<'e'>> DIpvaD tammey je (Dar'Qang) - Mon Mar 29 20:29:25 2004
Re: Using object prefixes with "intransitive" verbs (Dar'Qang) - Mon Mar 29 20:45:03 2004
-Daq, subject, object (Dar'Qang) - Mon Mar 29 20:59:48 2004
Re: <<'e'>> DIpvaD tammey je (Mark J. Reed) - Mon Mar 29 21:03:44 2004
Re: it; SIS (qe'San \(Jon Brown\)) - Mon Mar 29 23:08:25 2004
language change or inappropriate description? (MorphemeAddict) - Tue Mar 30 04:48:21 2004
Re: Using object prefixes with "intransitive" verbs (QeS lagh) - Tue Mar 30 04:52:22 2004
self-evident? (MorphemeAddict) - Tue Mar 30 04:53:01 2004
Re: about (Scott Willis) - Tue Mar 30 05:05:46 2004
Re: -Daq, subject, object (QeS lagh) - Tue Mar 30 05:06:05 2004
nuq ja' 'Iv? (MorphemeAddict) - Tue Mar 30 05:38:13 2004
Re: -Daq, subject, object (Scott Willis) - Tue Mar 30 05:41:43 2004
"Benefactives" (was:Re: Using object prefixes with "intransitive" verbs) (QuljIb) - Tue Mar 30 05:55:47 2004
lojmItDaq puqbe'wI' vIlegh. (MorphemeAddict) - Tue Mar 30 06:04:41 2004
Re: Using object prefixes with "intransitive" verbs (David Trimboli) - Tue Mar 30 07:09:35 2004
Re: lojmItDaq puqbe'wI' vIlegh. (David Trimboli) - Tue Mar 30 07:14:24 2004
Re: about (David Trimboli) - Tue Mar 30 07:26:07 2004
Re: -Daq, subject, object (Steven Boozer) - Tue Mar 30 08:13:20 2004
Re: -Daq, subject, object (Lieven L . Litaer) - Tue Mar 30 10:48:02 2004
Re: qIDmey {Haiku}mey je (Alan Anderson) - Tue Mar 30 15:18:17 2004
Re: it; SIS (Alan Anderson) - Tue Mar 30 15:27:56 2004
Re: it; SIS (Alan Anderson) - Tue Mar 30 16:59:47 2004
Re: -Daq, subject, object (Alan Anderson) - Tue Mar 30 17:25:00 2004
RE: tetlhvamDaq Hoch nuvpu' /everyone on this list (d'Armond Speers, Ph.D.) - Tue Mar 30 17:58:27 2004
Re: -Daq, subject, object (QeS lagh) - Tue Mar 30 19:29:36 2004
Re: qIDmey {Haiku}mey je (QeS lagh) - Tue Mar 30 19:31:33 2004
Re: about (QeS lagh) - Tue Mar 30 19:35:30 2004
Re: about (Alan Anderson) - Tue Mar 30 20:21:40 2004
Re: it; SIS (David Trimboli) - Tue Mar 30 20:48:07 2004
Re: it; SIS (Alan Anderson) - Tue Mar 30 21:02:12 2004
Re: -Daq, subject, object (Dar'Qang) - Tue Mar 30 21:05:48 2004
Re: Using object prefixes with "intransitive" verbs (Dar'Qang) - Tue Mar 30 22:03:16 2004
Re: it; SIS (qe'San \(Jon Brown\)) - Tue Mar 30 22:40:06 2004
Re: Using object prefixes with "intransitive" verbs (QeS lagh) - Tue Mar 30 23:38:26 2004
Re: Using object prefixes with "intransitive" verbs (Shamammd) - Tue Mar 30 23:46:37 2004
Re: Using object prefixes with "intransitive" verbs (QeS lagh) - Wed Mar 31 01:11:03 2004
Page of problems for KLI Wiki (was Re: lojmItDaq puqbe'wI' vIleghpu') (QeS lagh) - Wed Mar 31 03:26:56 2004
groan (MorphemeAddict) - Wed Mar 31 05:17:03 2004
ghunchu'wI' QIn vIyajmeH QaH vIpoQbej. (MorphemeAddict) - Wed Mar 31 05:48:16 2004
Re: Using object prefixes with "intransitive" verbs (Shamammd) - Wed Mar 31 06:30:42 2004
Re: groan (Steven Boozer) - Wed Mar 31 07:12:06 2004
Re: it; SIS (David Trimboli) - Wed Mar 31 08:31:16 2004
Re: about (David Trimboli) - Wed Mar 31 08:35:04 2004
Re: Using object prefixes with "intransitive" verbs (David Trimboli) - Wed Mar 31 08:41:41 2004
Re: Page of problems for KLI Wiki (was Re: lojmItDaq puqbe'wI' vIleghpu') (David Trimboli) - Wed Mar 31 08:43:45 2004
Re: ghunchu'wI' QIn vIyajmeH QaH vIpoQbej. (David Trimboli) - Wed Mar 31 08:48:45 2004
Re: it; SIS (MorphemeAddict) - Wed Mar 31 08:52:50 2004
reH 'e' Daqap (MorphemeAddict) - Wed Mar 31 09:08:18 2004
Re: reH 'e' Daqap (A4773492) - Wed Mar 31 10:57:14 2004
Re: about (Teresh000) - Wed Mar 31 11:06:27 2004
Re: about (David Trimboli) - Wed Mar 31 11:26:41 2004
Re: groan (Alan Anderson) - Wed Mar 31 11:33:34 2004
Re: Using object prefixes with "intransitive" verbs (QeS lagh) - Wed Mar 31 14:15:28 2004
Re: {tlhob} vs. {ghel} vs. {yu'} (Steven Boozer) - Wed Mar 31 14:54:24 2004
Re: it; SIS (Alan Anderson) - Wed Mar 31 17:15:39 2004
Re: it; SIS (Alan Anderson) - Wed Mar 31 17:15:39 2004
Re: ghunchu'wI' QIn vIyajmeH QaH vIpoQbej. (Alan Anderson) - Wed Mar 31 17:26:32 2004
Re: ghunchu'wI' QIn vIyajmeH QaH vIpoQbej. (Shamammd) - Wed Mar 31 17:58:52 2004
Re: it; SIS (Alan Anderson) - Wed Mar 31 18:06:14 2004
Re: it; SIS (David Trimboli) - Wed Mar 31 18:19:32 2004
Re: it; SIS (Shamammd) - Wed Mar 31 21:03:15 2004
Re: ghunchu'wI' QIn vIyajmeH QaH vIpoQbej. (A4773492) - Wed Mar 31 22:01:13 2004
-Daq with verbs of motion (Dar'Qang) - Wed Mar 31 22:17:46 2004
Re: it; SIS (A4773492) - Wed Mar 31 22:35:37 2004
Re: -Daq with verbs of motion (A4773492) - Wed Mar 31 22:56:22 2004
Re: it; SIS (qe'San \(Jon Brown\)) - Wed Mar 31 23:10:47 2004
Re: ghunchu'wI' QIn vIyajmeH QaH vIpoQbej./KLBC (Shamammd) - Wed Mar 31 23:12:30 2004
Re: it; SIS (Shamammd) - Wed Mar 31 23:20:37 2004
Re: -Daq with verbs of motion (Shamammd) - Wed Mar 31 23:25:50 2004
Re: ghunchu'wI' QIn vIyajmeH QaH vIpoQbej./KLBC (A4773492) - Wed Mar 31 23:38:21 2004
Re: it; SIS (A4773492) - Wed Mar 31 23:56:33 2004

Starting: Mon Mar 01 08:17:10 2004
Ending: Wed Mar 31 23:56:33 2004
Number of messages: 589