Description/Reason:
No, not that Quark. (up, down, charm, strange, top/truth, bottom/beauty)
Comment below with feedback and suggestions.
Responses
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Category: General Noun
No, not that Quark. (up, down, charm, strange, top/truth, bottom/beauty)
Comment below with feedback and suggestions.
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Please confirm you want to block this member.
You will no longer be able to:
Please allow a few minutes for this process to complete.
Can we make these using ngochjuH?
Please wait for a real expert to confirm this, but I THINK you could do something like:
(tISbogh) ngochjuH ruS: UP
(tISbogh) ngochjuH ngIng: DOWN
tISbogh might not be necessary since UP and DOWN are the most abundant quarks by a factor of 99.999999999…%, but if necessary, for CHARM and STRANGE we could respectively replace tInbogh with 'ughbogh. And then for TOP and BOTTOM maybe 'ughqu'bogh. I think theory only allows for 3 generations so tIS/'ugh/'ughqu' might be sufficient?
For the antiquarks, just add rugh in front of all of it. And then it's important to see that "((rugh ngochjuH) ruS)" is not the same as "(rugh (ngochjuH ruS))" so maybe then it can be good to always have the "tISbogh" so we know "rugh tISbogh ngochjuH ruS" can only be an antiUP.
Please someone confirm this makes sense…
One typo: tISbogh not tInbogh
Using {'ugh} to mean 'having more mass' makes sense because of {bIQSIp 'ugh} 'deuterium'.
But I would point out that we can *describe* elements using their atomic number: {tamler wejmaH Hut} for 'yttrium' etc. Nevertheless the *name* of yttrium is probably something different.