tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Fri Jan 29 13:25:47 2010

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: choH vs. choHmoH

Andrà MÃller ([email protected])

• From: Andrà MÃller <[email protected]>
• Subject: Re: choH vs. choHmoH
• Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2010 22:24:52 +0100
• Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=SbaWCWsU/ZdiCzLGrJ5bWhnuRpnq/gUferuA3uCvYD4=; b=P53kaPrGZzMeXhIXNEzh7NXwkdOz1CpNVXlA8SLLpzCzDdDfwaR7BQjXGXmt9aEF1Y OuYgK/McEr2v3aaRGUFX3DXgvPPyxmv6JcujPTsfkMKcRc6HHlJD93cLSa89CjNW0yek WismW06cFt4javVfJ46eA8rjJMNiqleEZ3taA=
• Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=ieULU7mW+ivJ+y5ZbmmKHPKxEJacTvgr+M6AMXL+Omkyq580ZmSbC1XvCyeJsKu1g0 NTPc+q5gM2H6K8qycVER2mFLEAECE26gBs5WVXfz/IsCaxcbhgUxYTqlCOUFfJi2Hdue HJBd200hVsoBZD1vyroFOIy4m3+jHLUzwlaLU=
• In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
• References: <[email protected]> <C305E6BD33E2654DAE1F8F403247B6A60113A1A5661D@EVS02.ad.uchicago.edu> <[email protected]> <C305E6BD33E2654DAE1F8F403247B6A60113A1A56622@EVS02.ad.uchicago.edu> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>

2010/1/29 David Trimboli <[email protected]>
>
> If the interpretation were correct, it would look like this:
>
>    He yIchoH
>    Change the course!
>
>    He yIchoHmoH
>    Be the cause of you changing the course!
>
>
Hmm, shouldn't that sentence translate rather as "Let the course change
it/sth.!"? The verb's not reflexive, so the subject/causer cannot be the
object here. If {choH} means change (the transitive verb), then "choHmoH"
would mean "cause sth. to change sth.", thus, in {He yIchoHmoH} you order
the course itself to change something else.

Greetings,
- André

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: choH vs. choHmoH
    • From: David Trimboli <[email protected]>

• References:
  • choH vs. choHmoH
    • From: Andrà MÃller <[email protected]>
  • RE: choH vs. choHmoH
    • From: Steven Boozer <[email protected]>
  • Re: choH vs. choHmoH
    • From: qurgh lungqIj <[email protected]>
  • RE: choH vs. choHmoH
    • From: Steven Boozer <[email protected]>
  • Re: choH vs. choHmoH
    • From: Andrà MÃller <[email protected]>
  • Re: choH vs. choHmoH
    • From: David Trimboli <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: choH vs. choHmoH
• Next by Date: Re: choH vs. choHmoH
• Previous by thread: Re: choH vs. choHmoH
• Next by thread: Re: choH vs. choHmoH
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level