tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Fri Jan 29 13:21:05 2010

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: choH vs. choHmoH

David Trimboli ([email protected])

• From: David Trimboli <[email protected]>
• Subject: Re: choH vs. choHmoH
• Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2010 16:19:57 -0500
• In-reply-to: <C305E6BD33E2654DAE1F8F403247B6A60113A1A5661D@EVS02.ad.uchicago.edu>
• References: <[email protected]> <C305E6BD33E2654DAE1F8F403247B6A60113A1A5661D@EVS02.ad.uchicago.edu>
• User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-US; rv:1.9.1.7) Gecko/20100111 Thunderbird/3.0.1

On 1/29/2010 12:11 PM, Steven Boozer wrote:
> FYI the suffix pair {-choHmoH} - yes, I know that Andre is talking about the verb {choH} - does show up twice in the vocabulary as {lamHa'choHmoH} "get something cleaned":
>
>    nuqDaq waqwIj vIlamHa'choHmoH
>    Where can I get my shoes cleaned? {TKD)
>
> and {'IHchoHmoH} "suit":
>
>    Du'IHchoHmoH mIvvam
>    This helmet suits you. (TKD)

Don't forget

    maghoSchoHmoHneS'a'
    may we execute a course (to someplace)? (TKD)

-- 
SuStel
http://www.trimboli.name/

• References:
  • choH vs. choHmoH
    • From: Andrà MÃller <[email protected]>
  • RE: choH vs. choHmoH
    • From: Steven Boozer <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: choH vs. choHmoH
• Next by Date: Re: choH vs. choHmoH
• Previous by thread: Re: choH vs. choHmoH
• Next by thread: Re: choH vs. choHmoH
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level