tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Tue Sep 30 17:31:13 2008

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]

Re: No lut tlhaQ, Eh?

David Trimboli ([email protected])

From: David Trimboli <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: No lut tlhaQ, Eh?
Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2008 20:29:50 -0400
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Windows/20080914)

Christopher Fulkerson, Ph.D. wrote:
> Oh, I get it, you think Klingons don't do humor.   Let me hope you are not
> involved in restoring any lut tlhaQ, such as The Confusion Is Great
> Because of Nothing.    Methinks that were you in that play you would be
> confused.

<paghmo' tIn mIS> lInglu'meH jIQaH jIH'e', 'ej wej bItlhaQ 'e' vInoH. 
naDev bItlhaQlaH, 'ach tlhoyHa' yIDogh'eghmoH; qoH vuvbe' SuS.

-- 
SuStel
Stardate 8750.2

References:
- Re: Apology, and Question: Is There a Third Party Here?
  - From: "Thorwald Peeters" <[email protected]>
- RE: Apology, and Question: Is There a Third Party Here?
  - From: Steven Boozer <[email protected]>
- To the List Regiment
  - From: "Christopher Fulkerson, Ph.D." <[email protected]>
- Re: To the List Regiment
  - From: ghunchu'wI' <[email protected]>
- Re: To the List Regiment
  - From: "Christopher Fulkerson, Ph.D." <[email protected]>
- Re: To the List Regiment
  - From: ghunchu'wI' 'utlh <[email protected]>
- No lut tlhaQ, Eh?
  - From: "Christopher Fulkerson, Ph.D." <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: No lut tlhaQ, Eh?
Next by Date: Re: No lut tlhaQ, Eh?
Previous by thread: mIywI'maj chu'
Next by thread: RE: To the List Regiment
Index(es):