tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Tue Jul 16 10:54:16 2002

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: romanization

• From: Stephan Schneider <[email protected]>
• Subject: Re: romanization
• Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2002 12:08:33 +0200
• In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
• References: <[email protected]><a05111b0db956f903d370@[213.7.184.47]><[email protected]>

lab DloraH:

>  > so <latlh> is a noun. <latlh tlhInganpu'> is "the others of the
>  > klingons", right?
>
>Well, no.  This particular example sounds really weird, but it would be closer
>to "klingons of others".  Let's use other examples that don't sound so bad.

yes, of course!! oops. now it makes sence. but it _is_ a noun-noun 
construction, right? it's strange to me to have a noun that means 
"the others"... but that's klingon.

thank you very much.

sts.

• Follow-Ups:
  • latlh
    • From: "David Trimboli" <[email protected]>

• References:
  • Re: romanization
    • From: Andrew Strader <[email protected]>
  • Re: romanization
    • From: Stephan Schneider <[email protected]>
  • Re: romanization
    • From: [email protected]

• Prev by Date: Re: Translating vs. Thinking
• Next by Date: Re: Dop Hurgh HoS; <r><w><y>
• Prev by thread: Re: romanization
• Next by thread: latlh
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level