tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Fri Jan 07 16:35:26 2011

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]

Re: mu'tlheghvam yIlughmoH

Ruben Molina ([email protected])



On Fri, Jan 7, 2011 at 6:44 PM, Felix Malmenbeck <[email protected]> wrote:
> I feel that in order to be properly direct, one should incorporate a question or command, rather than just making a statement. ÂMy personal favorite remains {nuq 'oH bomvam 'o'megh'e'.}, as it gets the point across. ÂAdding "I don't know it yet." would normally be redundant; if you knew it, you probably wouldn't ask.

qaQochbe'.

> However, it appears that the original intent was also to clarify that the speaker doesn't recognize it **yet**, as opposed to, say, that he's never heard it. ÂFor clarifications like these, I feel that using multiple sentences makes a lot of sense.

bIlugh.

{nuq 'oH bomvam 'o'megh'e'}, wej 'e' vISov 'ach 'e' vISovlI'.
chaq 'e' DaSov je, vaj 'e' chojanglaHchugh yIruch.

>> 'ach DuHmey chu' ghojlaHmeH ÂvIgheltaH.
> An important thing to remember about purpose clauses is that you need to use the right verb prefix for the purpose action.

bIlugh.

> ghojlaHmeH 'Iv DagheltaH?

wIghojlaHmeH  vIgheltaH.

Felix qatlho'
ruben






Back to archive top level