tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Wed Dec 19 18:37:22 2007

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]

Re: jIHtaHbogh naDev vISovbe'

Alan Anderson ([email protected])

From: Alan Anderson <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: jIHtaHbogh naDev vISovbe'
Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2007 21:33:20 -0500
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>

ja' SuStel:

> YES! How many times do I have to say it? WE DON'T HAVE PROPER KLINGON
> GRAMMATICAL TERMS SO I'M USING APPROXIMATIONS TAKEN FROM ENGLISH.

So what's wrong with calling it "pronoun as verb"?  Why bring in an  
approximation from outside our experience when we can name it  
directly, using the same words TKD uses to describe it in section 6.3?

-- ghunchu'wI'

Follow-Ups:
- Re: jIHtaHbogh naDev vISovbe'
  - From: David Trimboli <[email protected]>

References:
- Re: jIHtaHbogh naDev vISovbe'
  - From: McArdle <[email protected]>
- Re: jIHtaHbogh naDev vISovbe'
  - From: Alan Anderson <[email protected]>
- Re: jIHtaHbogh naDev vISovbe'
  - From: David Trimboli <[email protected]>
- Re: jIHtaHbogh naDev vISovbe'
  - From: qa'vaj <[email protected]>
- Re: jIHtaHbogh naDev vISovbe'
  - From: David Trimboli <[email protected]>
- Re: jIHtaHbogh naDev vISovbe'
  - From: qa'vaj <[email protected]>
- Re: jIHtaHbogh naDev vISovbe'
  - From: David Trimboli <[email protected]>
- Re: jIHtaHbogh naDev vISovbe'
  - From: Alan Anderson <[email protected]>
- Re: jIHtaHbogh naDev vISovbe'
  - From: David Trimboli <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: On studying Klingon
Next by Date: Re: jIHtaHbogh naDev vISovbe'
Previous by thread: Re: jIHtaHbogh naDev vISovbe'
Next by thread: Re: jIHtaHbogh naDev vISovbe'
Index(es):