tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Wed Dec 19 15:51:38 2007
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: jIHtaHbogh naDev vISovbe'
- From: qa'vaj <[email protected]>
- Subject: Re: jIHtaHbogh naDev vISovbe'
- Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2007 17:45:16 -0600
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; bh=ukCb2orxE9I7s7MzcacJMTIwmyeWJ4sT/f0+zbb19iU=; b=Q3H5iROmCYdgerBGtEgerF0egf6lbcppQ/BX1N6j2zuyIwpdV9HwXQD75pSBvLydZWVseR1zk4C7YnspMNlcVMCYZJL2qFr04GjviyJQOs0cMww4yQ58VZol506tYHz6RHiJ+TSBVKjwGJ9XywNEPyFsgGEinPQ7sGvvuzUI2d4=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=ezB2TvSV19knIBzuHLeC5WJ6bbpU+uTxaXNGVmvqWVEtoEbbIKzHsJNDjW6bbazGmcaA6gzvV8ipOkx8LrDBSXnuEqyDq/DOZTPNvkOh/81JGKTNkSriO+t0WHfHi4F2W4NgVbAOqaA5gbJ7z1POSlryJVmSPHiRwYl6EsedpiI=
- In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
- References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
On Dec 19, 2007 12:44 PM, David Trimboli <[email protected]> wrote:
> There isn't much semantic difference, but there IS a reason to make the
> distinction. If {pa'DajDaq} isn't the predicative, but a locative, then
> there is no predicative. The sentence would be *{pa'DajDaq, ghaH
> HoD'e'}. But *{ghaH HoD'e'} isn't a valid sentence so far as we know.
> And why isn't it *{pa'Daq, HoD ghaH}? Why not *{HoD'e', pa'Daq, ghaH}?
>
DaH! maj!
This is the crux: *{ghaH HoD'e'} not being accepted as a valid sentence.
I've always interpreted the distinction as being symmetric with swapping the
subject in English:
HoD ghaH
"He is the captain"
ghaH HoD'e'
"The captain is he"
But you comments indicate that the latter is unattested. I certainly agree
with the reasoning that if:
<pronoun> [topic]'e'
Isn't a sentence, than neither is:
[headers] <pronoun> [topic]'e'
Under that assumption, I like your grammatical description.
Does that imply that <pronoun> is not a grammatical sentence, because can't
the topic be placed in the header as well?
--
qa'vaj
qo'lIj DachenmoHtaH