tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Sat Dec 30 22:16:57 2006
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: "conjunction"?
On Sat, 30 Dec 2006, Alan Anderson wrote:
> ja' ...Paul:
>> On Fri, 29 Dec 2006, Steven Boozer wrote:
>>> You may be right. All our evidence for {muv} imply joining a
>>> group of people:
>>
>> I'll be printing this out and putting it on a wall. ;)
>
> yIHoj. tlhoy'lIj yIpol. Voragh tlhochba' chovnatlh:
>
> tuj muvwI' "thermo-suture"
chaq jIlugh 'e' jatlhpu'mo' jISey neH... :)
I'm only excited that he said I might've been right. ;)
Good counter example, but it depends on what perspective was used to name
it, and how it actually works. If the suture works by binding to a heat
source, it could be consistent with the idea that the subject of /muv/
would be the thing "joining": "joiner of heat", the literal translation,
could still mean it binds TO heat...
But yeah, probably not. ;)
...Paul
** ...Paul, [email protected], Insane Engineer **
** Visit Project Galactic Guide http://www.galactic-guide.com/ **
"Failure is not an option."
![[KLI Member]](/pics/KLImemberbutton.gif "[KLI Member]"){kind=small}