tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Wed May 28 16:13:47 2003

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]

Re: Hallmark BoP commercial

From: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Hallmark BoP commercial
Date: Wed, 28 May 2003 15:18:04 -0400 (EDT)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
References: <20030528_164021_C1_0031d8c3_C2_0000024c_Name_00003266753@agrana.com> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
User-Agent: IMP/PHP IMAP webmail program 2.2.6

> > > And if you are correct, why isn't the definition of /vIH/ "motion, be
> > > in motion (v)"?
> > 
> > Isn't "motion", by itself, a noun?
> 
> Isn't "move," by itself, different than "be in motion"?  :)

It's still a verb.  And the two are glossed together.  :P


DloraH

References:
- Re: Hallmark BoP commercial
  - From: "christoph.pichlmann" <[email protected]>
- Re: Hallmark BoP commercial
  - From: "David Trimboli" <[email protected]>
- Re: Hallmark BoP commercial
  - From: [email protected]
- Re: Hallmark BoP commercial
  - From: "David Trimboli" <[email protected]>
- Re: Hallmark BoP commercial
  - From: [email protected]
- Re: Hallmark BoP commercial
  - From: "David Trimboli" <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: using {joj} "area between" (n.)
Next by Date: Re: Learning Klingon
Prev by thread: Re: Hallmark BoP commercial
Next by thread: Re: {vIH} "move, be in motion"?
Index(es):