tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Wed May 28 13:04:20 2003

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: Hallmark BoP commercial

• From: [email protected]
• Subject: Re: Hallmark BoP commercial
• Date: Wed, 28 May 2003 13:57:58 -0400 (EDT)
• In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
• References: <20030528_164021_C1_0031d8c3_C2_0000024c_Name_00003266753@agrana.com> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
• User-Agent: IMP/PHP IMAP webmail program 2.2.6

> And if you are correct, why isn't the definition of /vIH/ "motion, be
> in motion (v)"?

Isn't "motion", by itself, a noun?


DloraH

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Hallmark BoP commercial
    • From: "David Trimboli" <[email protected]>

• References:
  • Re: Hallmark BoP commercial
    • From: "christoph.pichlmann" <[email protected]>
  • Re: Hallmark BoP commercial
    • From: "David Trimboli" <[email protected]>
  • Re: Hallmark BoP commercial
    • From: [email protected]
  • Re: Hallmark BoP commercial
    • From: "David Trimboli" <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Wiki in Klingon?
• Next by Date: Re: how aspect works in Klingon?
• Prev by thread: Re: Hallmark BoP commercial
• Next by thread: Re: Hallmark BoP commercial
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level