tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Wed May 28 14:06:52 2003

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: Hallmark BoP commercial

• From: "David Trimboli" <[email protected]>
• Subject: Re: Hallmark BoP commercial
• Date: Wed, 28 May 2003 15:00:26 -0400
• References: <20030528_164021_C1_0031d8c3_C2_0000024c_Name_00003266753@agrana.com> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>

From: <[email protected]>

> > And if you are correct, why isn't the definition of /vIH/ "motion, be
> > in motion (v)"?
> 
> Isn't "motion", by itself, a noun?

Isn't "move," by itself, different than "be in motion"?  :)

SuStel
Stardate 3405.3

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Hallmark BoP commercial
    • From: [email protected]

• References:
  • Re: Hallmark BoP commercial
    • From: "christoph.pichlmann" <[email protected]>
  • Re: Hallmark BoP commercial
    • From: "David Trimboli" <[email protected]>
  • Re: Hallmark BoP commercial
    • From: [email protected]
  • Re: Hallmark BoP commercial
    • From: "David Trimboli" <[email protected]>
  • Re: Hallmark BoP commercial
    • From: [email protected]

• Prev by Date: Re: jaghla'
• Next by Date: Re: using {joj} "area between" (n.)
• Prev by thread: Re: Hallmark BoP commercial
• Next by thread: Re: Hallmark BoP commercial
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level