tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Sun May 14 21:42:35 1995

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: Klingon babes(?)

• From: [email protected] (Bryan Fields)
• Subject: Re: Klingon babes(?)
• Date: Sun, 14 May 1995 21:40:27 -0700

You wrote: 
>

>I'd think it would be more like {ghIlqa'}. There is no <G> in
>the Klingon alphabet currently and a glottal stop would never
>happen between two consonants. [for what it's worth].

It's been a while and I wrote before I thought.  HIvqa' veqlargh.
But . . there was _definitly_ and <r> in there. How about {ghrIlqa'}?
 


>> yIHmey SurghwI' 
>
>Admirable profession.
>

teHbej.


Qapla'!

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Grilka?
    • From: Jeremy Cowan <[email protected]>
  • Re: Klingon babes(?)
    • From: "William H. Martin" <[email protected]>
  • Re: Klingon babes(?)
    • From: "Mark E. Shoulson" <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: {n/ng-a-'/gh/H}
• Next by Date: Re: Unsubscribing a account from Purchase
• Prev by thread: Re: Klingon babes(?)
• Next by thread: Re: Grilka?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level