tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Sun May 14 17:01:27 1995

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: Klingon babes(?)

• From: "William H. Martin" <[email protected]>
• Subject: Re: Klingon babes(?)
• Date: Sun, 14 May 95 20:01:27 EDT
• In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>; from "Bryan Fields" at May 13, 95 10:03 am

According to Bryan Fields:
> 
... 
> Well, one of the DS9 magazines printed her name as <Grilka>, which is 
> what I remember her name sounding like.  <Gril'Qa'> or <GrilQa'> might 
> better convey the proper tlhingan pronunciation.  

I'd think it would be more like {ghIlqa'}. There is no <G> in
the Klingon alphabet currently and a glottal stop would never
happen between two consonants. [for what it's worth].

> BTW, did anybody ever 
> check the Hol(-qoq?) that was used in the wedding and divorce?  Just 
> curious.

Several tried and I think we gave up. It was true to the
quality we have come to expect of the warrior's tongue spoken
on TV.

> yIHmey SurghwI' 

Admirable profession.

charghwI'
-- 

 \___
 o_/ \
 <\__,\
  ">   | Get a grip.
   `   |

• References:
  • Re: Klingon babes(?)
    • From: [email protected] (Bryan Fields)

• Prev by Date: Re: Can someone check this for me?
• Next by Date: Re: Transitivity
• Prev by thread: Re: Klingon babes(?)
• Next by thread: Re: Klingon babes(?)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level