tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Wed May 03 10:29:26 1995
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: pagh no'lI' (was: Re: pagh (was latlh))
- From: "William H. Martin" <[email protected]>
- Subject: Re: pagh no'lI' (was: Re: pagh (was latlh))
- Date: Wed, 3 May 95 13:29:23 EDT
- In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>; from "Mark E. Shoulson" at May 3, 95 10:55 am
According to Mark E. Shoulson:
>
> Ugh. MUCH too abstract. You'd spend more time explaining what that meant
> than you would extracting your victim's fist from your face.
ROTFL!
> If you want
> to insult his theoretical ancestors that way, try just no'qoqlI'.
>
> ~mark
I thought it might be even MORE insulting as no'law'lI'. qar'a'?
charghwI'
--
\___
o_/ \
<\__,\
"> | Get a grip.
` |