tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Wed May 03 19:38:12 1995

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: pagh no'lI' (was: Re: pagh (was latlh))

• From: "R.B Franklin" <[email protected]>
• Subject: Re: pagh no'lI' (was: Re: pagh (was latlh))
• Date: Wed, 3 May 1995 19:27:03 -0700 (PDT)
• In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>

Wed, 3 May 1995, ghItlh charghwI':

> I thought it might be even MORE insulting as no'law'lI'. qar'a'?

wot mojaq 'oH <-law'>'e'.  DIp mojaq poQ mu'vam.  rurchuqmo' <-law'> <-Hey> 
je chaq <-Hey> Dajatlh 'e' DaHech qar'a'?

> charghwI'

yoDtargh

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: pagh no'lI' (was: Re: pagh (was latlh))
    • From: "William H. Martin" <[email protected]>

• References:
  • Re: pagh no'lI' (was: Re: pagh (was latlh))
    • From: "William H. Martin" <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: "size" and -ghach
• Next by Date: Subscribe
• Prev by thread: Re: pagh no'lI' (was: Re: pagh (was latlh))
• Next by thread: Re: pagh no'lI' (was: Re: pagh (was latlh))
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level