tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Wed May 03 13:00:55 1995
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: pagh no'lI' (was: Re: pagh (was latlh))
- From: "Silauren, Half-Elven" <[email protected]>
- Subject: Re: pagh no'lI' (was: Re: pagh (was latlh))
- Date: Wed, 3 May 1995 16:00:52 -0400 (EDT)
- In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
On Wed, 3 May 1995, William H. Martin wrote:
> According to Mark E. Shoulson:
> > If you want
> > to insult his theoretical ancestors that way, try just no'qoqlI'.
> I thought it might be even MORE insulting as no'law'lI'. qar'a'?
ghobe'! qarbe'! charghwI', isn't <-law'> a verb suffix??
or am i missing some non-TKD canon definition of a verb-root <no'>?
> > ~mark
> charghwI'
--naQ'avwI'