tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Wed Feb 03 14:08:26 2010

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]

RE: Honoured

kff ([email protected])



Points taken!

"QInlIj vIHevmo' jIquv" vIjatlh vIneHbej.

/buSwI'


Quoting Steven Boozer <[email protected]>:

> buSwI':
>> Finally, I seems to me that {batlh QInlIj vIHev} would be even less
>> polite; I could say that if I was Quvar's equal, for instance.
>
> Personally, I would be reluctant to use {batlh} "with honor,  
> honorably, in an honorable fashion" to refer to my own actions.  It  
> smacks of {DavHam} "false honor".
>
> I could find no examples of {batlh} used in the 1st person singular  
> with {jIH}, {jI-} or {vI-}, although I did find:
>
>   batlh qaghojmoHpu'
>   It has been an honor to instruct you. CK
>
>   batlh qaghojmoH
>   It has been an honor to instruct you. PK
>
> {qa-} "I [do something] to you" may be acceptable here because  
> you're really complimenting the person you're addressing and not  
> yourself.
>
> I also found three examples of {batlh} used with the 1st person  
> plural prefix:
>
>   batlh maHegh
>   [We die honorably.] CK
>
>   pIj maSuvpu' batlh maSuvpu' 'ej maQapbejta'
>   In our many battles, we have fought with honor and achieved VICTORY!
>    (Hallmark)
>
>   batlh maHeghbej 'ej yo' qIjDaq vavpu'ma' DImuv. pa' reH maSuvtaHqu'
>   Then we die with honor and join our fathers in the Black Fleet where
>    we battle forever. (Anthem)
>
> {ma-} may be acceptable because you're referring to the group and  
> not yourself alone.
>
> And while we're speaking of honor (and the lack thereof), there are  
> several more verbs to consider in addition to {quv} "be  
> honored/honorable} and {quvmoH} "honor" vs. {quvHa'} "be dishonored"  
> and {quvHa'moH} "dishonor":
>
> HoQ      be honored falsely, be falsely honorable (v.)
> HoQmoH   honor falsely (v.)
>
> Qaq      behave falsely honorably, behave in a falsely honorable manner (v.)
> QaqmoH   cause to behave in a falsely honorable manner (v.)
>
> mIl      be formerly honored (v.)
> mIlmoH   honor formerly (v.)
>
> Okrand discussed the nuances in HolQeD:
>
> HQ 12.3:8f.:  Maltz [...] said [{HoQ}] could be used in the same  
> places {quv} "be honored, be honorable" could be used, but only then  
> the honor was not legitimate. Thus, a delegate to the Klingon Empire  
> could well be described as a {Duy quv} "honored emissary", but if it  
> turned out that he or she was a spy, the phrase {Duy HoQ} "falsely  
> honored emissary" would be appropriate. [...] {Qaq}... is used in  
> cases where one misrepresents oneself in order to be accorded honor  
> one is not entitled to, and in that way it is different from {toj}  
> "deceive" and {ghet} "pretend", neither of which has this kind of  
> connection to honor [...] Maltz mentioned one noun associated with  
> these verbs, {DavHam}, which he defined simply as "false honor", but  
> which really covers the same semantic ground as both {HoQ} and {Qaq}  
> (but not really {mIl}). {DavHam} is different from {quvHa'ghach}  
> "dishonor (noun)" in that the latter does not imply seeming to be  
> honorable or the appearance of honorability, but
>   rather the lack of or loss of honor.)
>
>
> --
> Voragh
> Canon Master of the Klingons
>
>
>
>
>
>



----------------------------------------------------------------
This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.







Back to archive top level