tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Wed Feb 03 07:06:28 2010
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: KLBC: tlhIngan qeq
- From: Terrence Donnelly <[email protected]>
- Subject: Re: KLBC: tlhIngan qeq
- Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2010 07:04:21 -0800 (PST)
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sbcglobal.net; s=s1024; t=1265209461; bh=D8beWA+u09bw6AUZijXn78AArUPSCiw5vAHnUR/63jc=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=XPi3KinO0bA7IpVdIuS1BL8r7u/klYQ4ClSf6d5FeS9AcO+52u7AYF5SFd/GzP6JaHa9wx/8W3JhJYuVtiLGDpYIOwCx+iUnEBqOQgdVTnq+S/ryYdSZeU2swKnX8p3sd12FKAwjcSG0vTahhFKA6qh8NDqEPTK4yh5UoCLcRj8=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=sbcglobal.net; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=NvnDBZKZAwRKgSSX/5paZpEfvvMk8Sz0eRuiI0lsZjoeMb9KNo29GHGGwvjGK6Yl5snSRBFFdt8PfAaNTEmrJ55Iq9LZA9lPHfd40N1KmOyrWYUAq9NP2W9pr+g+FEtTdLZzddKD/btpV1K+kiJbIBYDgX46SmfWEr9DIg326xw=;
(It's unclear to me if quvar was intending to suggest corrections or let these stand on their own. As the last BG, I'll take the liberty of responding. If I have overstepped my bounds, please excuse me and let me know.)
--- On Tue, 2/2/10, [email protected] <[email protected]> wrote:
> QInlIj vIHev 'e' vIquv!
> (I am honored to receive your message)
>
Since {quv} 'be honored' doesn't take objects, this should be
QInlIj vIHevmo' jIquv
(note the "no object" verb prefix on {quv})
[pe'...] Mostly good, but watch the capitalization of 'I'
>
> 'oHmey DaghItlhpu'bogh 'oHmey vIghItlhbogh ghap?
> (Those you wrote or those I write?)
>
The "plural" of {'oH} is {bIH}, but stylistically, I'd probably just repeat {mu'tlhegh}, since we know Klingons don't mind repetition.
>
> /buSwI'
maj. batlh DaghItlh.
-- ter'eS