tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Wed Nov 25 12:40:49 2009

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]

Re: long sentence (was Re: pu'jIn)

David Trimboli ([email protected])

From: David Trimboli <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: long sentence (was Re: pu'jIn)
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 15:39:02 -0500
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <C305E6BD33E2654DAE1F8F403247B6A6011382A8826B@EVS02.ad.uchicago.edu> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (Windows/20090812)

Lieven Litaer wrote:
> ja# ghunchu'wI':
>> It was probably ten or twelve years ago when a few of us tried to
>>  quantify our mental "stack size" for parsing nested relative 
>> clauses.
> 
> For my qepHom, I made a long sentence to show exactly this phenomena.
> n german too we have long sentences without any problem,

So how well do you handle long strings of genitive nouns in Klingon?

-- 
SuStel
tlhIngan Hol MUSH
http://trimboli.name/mush

Follow-Ups:
- Re: long sentence (was Re: pu'jIn)
  - From: "Lieven Litaer" <[email protected]>

References:
- RE: pu'jIn
  - From: Steven Boozer <[email protected]>
- RE: pu'jIn
  - From: Terrence Donnelly <[email protected]>
- Re: pu'jIn
  - From: Christopher Doty <[email protected]>
- Re: pu'jIn
  - From: David Trimboli <[email protected]>
- Re: pu'jIn
  - From: Christopher Doty <[email protected]>
- Re: pu'jIn
  - From: David Trimboli <[email protected]>
- Re: pu'jIn
  - From: Christopher Doty <[email protected]>
- Re: pu'jIn
  - From: David Trimboli <[email protected]>
- Re: pu'jIn
  - From: Christopher Doty <[email protected]>
- Re: pu'jIn
  - From: "ghunchu'wI'" <[email protected]>
- long sentence (was Re: pu'jIn)
  - From: "Lieven Litaer" <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: The topic marker -'e'
Next by Date: Re: The topic marker -'e'
Previous by thread: long sentence (was Re: pu'jIn)
Next by thread: Re: long sentence (was Re: pu'jIn)
Index(es):