tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Mon Nov 23 13:50:25 2009
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: Question about -wI'
- From: Eric Koske <[email protected]>
- Subject: Re: Question about -wI'
- Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 16:49:10 -0500
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=Nih8g+hCXrFl01fqbOBZ4MInOo7vjeFDrtPSafMQms0=; b=XHEL30oWQtxzngDf+Aju341jID0UqbTjKeLY6q8hchd4OOxs5DCYCAfbJq2rqj1HG8 INSRM4vW4XL2pNyGSUDEmLamopa5iyp9YOqC3tICXU8JdfuVNJRUQj9iTsTKO27g8Zc2 4jxURviIPs8uCWYrpBVazEJYdFH6mn+ouaR3c=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=kF1DDBDGyPmeuoC4ogSfv0OezMnFSD7FovzIoUyPgLCVytJizffygbmA0fJemtKi7b LT6GHFJKlxbtuEdORXwePTSM04ODM9dD3VYjjq56ichMRwTSSmVYRK/hdvPO3K+TP1aC /BXkfgxjXEYVAQXY1S3OUEKY+Knm4UyEz+Bnw=
- In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
- References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Well, you *can* add {-wI'} to nouns, but it has a different meaning for
them.
It's the first-person possessive suffix for nouns who are beings capable of
language. ("my {x}")
{jup} = friend
{jupwI'} = my friend.
On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 4:19 PM, David Trimboli <[email protected]> wrote:
> Christopher Doty wrote:
> > Can -wI' go on nouns? Or does this mean that, as with many Klingon
> > words, the noun Hergh is identical to a verb with roughly the same
> > meaning, "administer medicine," and the verb Hergh is simply missing
> > from the dictionary?
>
> No, {-wI'} is only a verb suffix. There are some complex nouns that
> *look* like they're simple nouns plus {-wI'}, but we can't pull them
> apart and generalize new words or rules from them; we have to suppose
> that they're leftovers from Old Klingon, or some such, and just treat
> them as distinct complex nouns. See also TKD 3.2.2.
>
> --
> SuStel
> tlhIngan Hol MUSH
> http://trimboli.name/mush
>
>
>
>