tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Sun Nov 22 21:53:29 2009
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: The topic marker -'e'
- From: Steven Lytle <[email protected]>
- Subject: Re: The topic marker -'e'
- Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 00:49:50 -0500
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=RIF5L++oRV8lXIP7Hr7MoALVNqvYt+g+Yj+jm6pdJn4=; b=iBJzLoP682r/iIUguqwlH7JUmpaP4zimg545LwkL0Q9G8kl1aJvGwQU4lWaLah2Atd +i2s1K/EqdHqiCyyIs9pfQXfosLZNOfBEYeCQ1vFAW3ishJI809x8FynMFz/9xhp/LRP h8z3cpNs9xQOn7WXQfD4CpG1JGKmLBX5jrOu0=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=gmdaIGcdYusBaijuumysWXz5oHKChndPU3hDwDCiHdq36ZiXYSmyXCLn4eLcz0AszH aNLnakXb5teglrM32dEE5a+hgR00frVpTxOFVwNog0h/l89M3dyJa4zJP5Kb+/LVm26i +2n3NpYizt0uXxDXXabsWTvy4iAQxjcbe0D9U=
- In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
- References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Now you've totally lost me.
lay'tel SIvten
On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 12:27 AM, Christopher Doty <[email protected]>wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 20:25, Steven Lytle <[email protected]> wrote:
> > I don't see any connection between what I suggested and "We kill robots".
> In
> > the first case, there are two subjects (ma- "we", Sor "tree(s)"), and
> since
> > they are both subjects, simply equate them; interpret them as meaning the
> > same thing.
> > Your example of "We kill robots" is totally different. There is one
> subject
> > and one object. There is no justification for equating "we" with
> "robots".
> > lay'tel SIvten
>
> These are exactly the same if the interpretation of "pum" is as the verb
> accuse.
>
>
>
>