tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Sun Nov 22 21:29:21 2009
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: The topic marker -'e'
- From: Christopher Doty <[email protected]>
- Subject: Re: The topic marker -'e'
- Date: Sun, 22 Nov 2009 21:27:53 -0800
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=poTMlCEy3Z3MQd31YM6hVQXWyyv1X2Jo/pDgu3esvBE=; b=JXyVWfR8MN0z/gzgQ/O1ttjMXJSxud41PCHMws2a/n8X6CZcRv2XVe4NezAcGhoahn aSUtPxh3ZrChNmfP7P/Z10jPb2Y292FMRQEHG4Nu7jPc/ju/iOdHlTDv70KEChILFson aXr3bytfatL4eh+rwU27cgpUu9kQp9HP5c/sg=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; b=rWVamntutLv17xFU8RSrUSMCUrQ+ABfZyvgZE3FaIvSx++sxh9AfSJteRjv9lFsyXW VtDoZYFUSEMBH0AJ/Wd6zagT/OP9vXyHz2EaGmxd+fN8VUToDirptFDOM/Pc+C+leoXo jJGpnvi3N8lBMWMuVBM8E0aWHdqnQnz0omJqA=
- In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
- References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 20:25, Steven Lytle <[email protected]> wrote:
> I don't see any connection between what I suggested and "We kill robots". In
> the first case, there are two subjects (ma- "we", Sor "tree(s)"), and since
> they are both subjects, simply equate them; interpret them as meaning the
> same thing.
> Your example of "We kill robots" is totally different. There is one subject
> and one object. There is no justification for equating "we" with "robots".
> lay'tel SIvten
These are exactly the same if the interpretation of "pum" is as the verb accuse.