tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Sun Jul 19 06:31:58 2009
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: Alternatives to Code2000 PUA Klingon Font
- From: "Mark J. Reed" <[email protected]>
- Subject: Re: Alternatives to Code2000 PUA Klingon Font
- Date: Sun, 19 Jul 2009 09:29:58 -0400
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=VWMGLOMz5IGVf+/79u9mZuOCRoqhPd7FSyrc+rnSY3o=; b=oHAL9fqK/BMqi49mXj4MkgGMEiPxRsWU9uLWbSyn93LNxiuC5g8QNpwaDg2DTJRj0q bS0TejdepZ3TuXg1aRxDbdNKVSqsACWQAPVxudpjv7N6DszgU0V/xnpEPsm0X2kVjLrH DMBN9SW5M75Eq1iusj46lt9LCKAIuxmKmv7LI=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=DVh7IeMpUKUNRCOdkTNga0FP1BXSQAt/ct4a6aqi//nPy30pd4tHfubw0RDXhRFzT/ p2uMLQXGGv0cmeakOXNurq3UKjCdYVMfGISWTqjFvJzHlpQpdxqrfYr5Wh3g3VHkEK1X R7O94W6PNoekvczQWzdNXDSmmewL1DdMacpxE=
- In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
- References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
What did you base the shapes of the glyphs on? I notice that they
differ significantly from the KLI font in some areas; for instance,
{gh} and {o} are a lot more similar to each other. I know that such
font variation is normal in typography, but it confused me.
On Sun, Jul 19, 2009 at 8:05 AM, Michael Everson<[email protected]> wrote:
> On 3 Jul 2009, at 02:29, Mark J. Reed wrote:
>
>> So are these fonts completely blank outside of the PUA pIqaD area?
>
> Not any more. But that might have been part of the problem.
>
> In addition to adding Latin characters (Mac and Windows character
> sets) I have made a few other changes, including resizing the glyphs
> slightly so that horizontal lines of text don't crash into each other.
> I have tested these on Windows XP (double clicking on the font file
> whilst on the desktop opens them as expected), and installed them via
> FontBook on Mac OS 10.4.11 and 10.5.7.
>
> I'd be grateful if people could test the new versions at http://www.evertype.com/fonts/tlh
>
> Michael Everson * http://www.evertype.com/
>
>
>
>
>
--
Mark J. Reed <[email protected]>