tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Sun Nov 18 20:38:03 2007

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]

Re: suffixes on adjectival verbs

Robyn Stewart ([email protected]) [KLI Member] [Hol po'wI']



I'm not certain where I fall on the conservative curve, but I accept 
it unblinkingly and there has been no one over the years that I 
recall needing to suppress the usage in order to keep 
happy.  (charghwI', qaparHamo' SoHvaD mu'tlheghvam vIqon. :-)
At 08:18 AM 11/18/2007, you wrote:
>On Nov 18, 2007 12:14 AM, Alan Anderson <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > <Duj ngaDHa'> yIqaw je.
> >
>maj! chovnatlhHeylIjmo' nejmeH Qu' vIruchta'. [KGT pg. 150]-Daq
>chovnatlhvam tu'lu'.  mu' {ngaDHa'} 'angbe' KGT mu'ghom. vaj latlh
>chovnatlhna' 'oH. ([pg 150]-Daq chovnatlhna' {tara'ngan ngaDHa'}
>tu'lu' je).
>
>Is it reasonable for me to take away from this discussion a belief
>that even conservative grammarians will accept {-be'} and {-Ha'} as
>well as {-qu'} on verbs used as adjectives following nouns, despite
>the description in TKD?
>
>--
>Qang qu'wI'
>
>
>
>
>
>
>--
>No virus found in this incoming message.
>Checked by AVG Free Edition.
>Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.16.0/1136 - Release Date: 
>11/17/2007 2:55 PM






Back to archive top level