tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Sun Nov 18 19:05:08 2007

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: suffixes on adjectival verbs

Alan Anderson ([email protected])

• From: Alan Anderson <[email protected]>
• Subject: Re: suffixes on adjectival verbs
• Date: Sun, 18 Nov 2007 22:03:25 -0500
• In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
• References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>

ja' Qang qu'wI':
> Is it reasonable for me to take away from this discussion a belief
> that even conservative grammarians will accept {-be'} and {-Ha'} as
> well as {-qu'} on verbs used as adjectives following nouns, despite
> the description in TKD?

HISlaH.  Hoch lengwI' lajlu'ba'.

-- ghunchu'wI'

• References:
  • suffixes on adjectival verbs
    • From: "Qang qu'wI'" <[email protected]>
  • Re: suffixes on adjectival verbs
    • From: Steven Boozer <[email protected]>
  • Re: suffixes on adjectival verbs
    • From: "Qang qu'wI'" <[email protected]>
  • Re: suffixes on adjectival verbs
    • From: Alan Anderson <[email protected]>
  • Re: suffixes on adjectival verbs
    • From: "Qang qu'wI'" <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: RE: nuqDaq 'oH puchpa''e'?
• Next by Date: Home based opportunity
• Previous by thread: Re: suffixes on adjectival verbs
• Next by thread: Re: suffixes on adjectival verbs
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level