tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Sun Feb 25 21:48:21 2007

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]

Re: Topic (was: Re: Dilbert Comic in Klingon for February 9, 2007)

MorphemeAddict ([email protected]) [KLI Member] [Hol taghwI']



In a message dated 2/25/2007 5:01:42 PM Central Standard Time, 
[email protected] writes:

> ghItlhpu' 'ISqu', ja':
> >Based on the description of {â??'e'} in TKD plus the canon

> >examples of its use, {wa'ben'e' qatoy'taH} can still be
> >interpreted as "It was a year ago that I was serving you,"
> >the implication being that it was not, say, a month ago,
> >(with -'e' marking focus, rather than topic).
> 
> Intriguing. The sentence-initial position of time stamps means that there's 
> no way for us to distinguish between the topic- and focus-marking functions 
> of {-'e'} here.
> 

Except context, of course.  

lay'tel SIvten





Back to archive top level