tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Wed Dec 19 17:21:34 2007

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]

Re: {-Daq} in complex sentences (was Re: jIHtaHbogh naDev vISovbe')

David Trimboli ( [KLI Member] [Hol po'wI']

Alan Anderson wrote:
>>>> ...what would be your
>>>> proposal for "He who fled's ship"
>>> Such a noun is still a noun, and nothing prevents it from being part
>>> of a noun-noun construction.  Except maybe the lack of syntax for
>>> making clear that it *is* the head noun.  If I want to be understood,
>>> I won't be that unclear.
>>> Haw'ta' ghaH.  DujDaj vIje'.
> ja' SuStel:
>> Haw'wI' Duj vIje'.
> rapbe' qech, 'ach ghaytan yap.
> Without the right context, It could be misunderstood as referring to  
> *a* flee-er's ship instead of *the* specific ship of he-who-fled.   
> But it's hard to imagine a line like that coming without warning.

Now you're just looking for trouble. Of course context will tell you 
whether it's "a" flee-er or "the" flee-er! This is always true in 
Klingon, where there are no articles to make this distinction for you.

Stardate 7967.2

Practice the Klingon language on the tlhIngan Hol MUSH.

Back to archive top level