tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Tue Dec 18 20:47:53 2007
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: {-Daq} in complex sentences (was Re: jIHtaHbogh naDev vISovbe')
- From: qa'vaj <[email protected]>
- Subject: Re: {-Daq} in complex sentences (was Re: jIHtaHbogh naDev vISovbe')
- Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2007 22:47:03 -0600
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; bh=vijtpTjkt4TE0zj1OQZiK7BOcJo72OxRw0n2A4dht0E=; b=LwRsMp/iMk75+gB/0nM2kTPvU1mcB0KG8IwoYVhKLEg0a7QXYbRFDPgb4YnH4vq0xWHkSmErIBvNuVkT8D24ZSFM941BzhFbwkeSsCLZRM147FOcIrNoAlrUB/XYru2WpRBH3B7JhtyN3HSWygQXJFigbGv87+jwuy9ApgEo8KM=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=uKkNr+AfR5Pat7hJiC5ok1gq3GGOtetmXPisL0E59rsuxHzK7scRjDm0rgIeH+IfRylzxfkSk86/6HrBYqZ/cwtKTcWf5hltTd0ZPjF7S08JVoT6ZjWg2CK0aKpJmDzgnFhOWUzTOnHnI6mjD+qWuoCy/5L4q9vfYyJPNtxctF0=
- In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
- References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
On Dec 17, 2007 6:30 PM, Alan Anderson <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> If my analysis is correct, we've been on the wrong track in the past
> by trying to translate "the ship in which I fled" as a complete
> sentence with a relative-clause marker added to it. Using the phrase
> "in which" rather than "where" leads us to seek a solution containing
> both {-Daq} and {-bogh}. Instead, I'm suggesting that the head noun
> "ship" isn't actually part of the relative clause "I fled." This
> disconnect neatly explains {jIHtaHbogh naDev}, and gives {jIHaw'bogh
> Duj} as the answer to the old problem.
>
>
What would your proposal be for "the ship in which he fled"?
Also, can a noun modified/qualified/described by a relative clause be used
in noun-noun apposition? If so, what would be your proposal for "He who
fled's ship"
Is it part of your idea that anytime that a relative clause modifies a head
noun that isn't the subject (or object), <<-bogh>> can only mean where/at/on
(locative sense)?
--
qa'vaj
qo'lIj DachenmoHtaH